DocumentCode
84302
Title
Performance Analysis of Fountain Codes in Multihop Relay Networks
Author
James, Ashish ; Madhukumar, A.S. ; Kurniawan, Edi ; Adachi, Fumiyuki
Author_Institution
Sch. of Comput. Eng., Nanyang Technol. Univ., Singapore, Singapore
Volume
62
Issue
9
fYear
2013
fDate
Nov. 2013
Firstpage
4379
Lastpage
4391
Abstract
Fountain codes have been extensively employed in delay-tolerant networks (DTNs) due to their near-capacity performance with very low encoding/decoding complexity. A decode-and-forward-based relaying strategy is ideally suited for fountain codes in such networks due to its ability to recover the source message from any subset of encoded packets with sufficient mutual information. However, the unreliable nature of the channel may lead to the starvation of some subsequent nodes with good channel conditions. By cooperation among the forwarding nodes, the overall latency of such networks can be alleviated. This paper analytically quantifies the latency of both cooperative and conventional fountain-coded delay-tolerant multihop networks by deriving the exact closed-form equations for the channel usage. The overall latency suffered by such networks forces conservation of the end-to-end delay, particularly for real-time applications. However, by constraining the total delay (the number of encoded transmissions), the performance of fountain codes deteriorates due to the lack of encoded packets for retrieving the entire source message. This degradation can be gauged by the average packet loss experienced with partial decoding of fountain codes. The exact closed-form equation for the average packet loss based on the channel usage for such delay-constrained networks (DCNs) is derived in this paper. The tradeoff between average delay and the channel usage required for successful decoding is also analyzed. It is observed that the average packet loss can be minimized by optimizing the total delay based on the performance across each link. Finally, the pros and cons of using DCNs and DTNs employing fountain codes are evaluated, and theoretical grounding to the simulated results is provided.
Keywords
decode and forward communication; decoding; delay tolerant networks; encoding; relay networks (telecommunication); average packet loss; channel usage; decode-and-forward-based relaying strategy; delay-constrained networks; delay-tolerant multihop networks; encoding-decoding complexity; end-to-end delay; forwarding nodes; fountain codes; multihop relay networks; partial decoding; performance analysis; Decoding; Delays; Encoding; Generators; Relays; Reliability; Spread spectrum communication; Conventional multihop networks; cooperative multihop networks; delay-constrained transmission; fountain/rateless codes;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Vehicular Technology, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9545
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TVT.2013.2265279
Filename
6522481
Link To Document