• DocumentCode
    84497
  • Title

    Nanophotonic Reservoir Computing With Photonic Crystal Cavities to Generate Periodic Patterns

  • Author

    Fiers, Martin Andre Agnes ; Van Vaerenbergh, Thomas ; Wyffels, Francis ; Verstraeten, David ; Schrauwen, Benjamin ; Dambre, Joni ; Bienstman, Peter

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Inf. Technol., Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
  • Volume
    25
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    Feb. 2014
  • Firstpage
    344
  • Lastpage
    355
  • Abstract
    Reservoir computing (RC) is a technique in machine learning inspired by neural systems. RC has been used successfully to solve complex problems such as signal classification and signal generation. These systems are mainly implemented in software, and thereby they are limited in speed and power efficiency. Several optical and optoelectronic implementations have been demonstrated, in which the system has signals with an amplitude and phase. It is proven that these enrich the dynamics of the system, which is beneficial for the performance. In this paper, we introduce a novel optical architecture based on nanophotonic crystal cavities. This allows us to integrate many neurons on one chip, which, compared with other photonic solutions, closest resembles a classical neural network. Furthermore, the components are passive, which simplifies the design and reduces the power consumption. To assess the performance of this network, we train a photonic network to generate periodic patterns, using an alternative online learning rule called first-order reduced and corrected error. For this, we first train a classical hyperbolic tangent reservoir, but then we vary some of the properties to incorporate typical aspects of a photonics reservoir, such as the use of continuous-time versus discrete-time signals and the use of complex-valued versus real-valued signals. Then, the nanophotonic reservoir is simulated and we explore the role of relevant parameters such as the topology, the phases between the resonators, the number of nodes that are biased and the delay between the resonators. It is important that these parameters are chosen such that no strong self-oscillations occur. Finally, our results show that for a signal generation task a complex-valued, continuous-time nanophotonic reservoir outperforms a classical (i.e., discrete-time, real-valued) leaky hyperbolic tangent reservoir (normalized root-mean-square errors=0.030 versus NRMSE=0.127).
  • Keywords
    learning (artificial intelligence); nanophotonics; neural nets; resonators; signal classification; RC; continuous-time nanophotonic reservoir; leaky hyperbolic tangent reservoir; machine learning; nanophotonic crystal cavities; neural network; neural systems; optical architecture; optical implementations; optoelectronic implementations; periodic patterns; power efficiency; resonators; signal classification; signal processing; speed efficiency; Cavity resonators; Delays; Neurons; Photonic crystals; Photonics; Reservoirs; Training; Integrated optics; optical neural network; pattern generation; photonic reservoir computing; supervised learning;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Neural Networks and Learning Systems, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    2162-237X
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNNLS.2013.2274670
  • Filename
    6579756