DocumentCode
85059
Title
Simulative Comparison of Multiprotocol Label Switching and OpenFlow Network Technologies for Transmission Operations
Author
Sydney, A. ; Nutaro, J. ; Scoglio, C. ; Gruenbacher, D. ; Schulz, Noel
Author_Institution
Electr. & Comput. Eng., Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA
Volume
4
Issue
2
fYear
2013
fDate
Jun-13
Firstpage
763
Lastpage
770
Abstract
Utility companies are integrating multiprotocol label switching (MPLS) technologies into existing backbone networks, including networks between substations and control centers. MPLS has mechanisms for efficient overlay technologies as well as mechanisms to enhance security: features essential to the functioning of the smart grid. However, with MPLS routing and other switching technologies innovation is restricted to the features enclosed “in the box.” More specifically, there is no practical way for utility operators or researchers to test new ideas such as alternatives to IP or MPLS on a realistic scale to obtain the experience and confidence necessary for real world deployments. As a result, novel ideas go untested. Conversely, the OpenFlow framework has enabled significant advancements in network research. OpenFlow provides utility operators and researchers the programmability and flexibility necessary to enable innovation in next-generation communication architectures for the smart grid. This level of flexibility allows OpenFlow to provide all features of MPLS and also allows OpenFlow devices to co-exist with existing MPLS devices. The simulation results in this paper demonstrate that OpenFlow performs as well as MPLS, and may therefore be considered an alternative to MPLS for smart grid applications.
Keywords
load management; multiprotocol label switching; next generation networks; smart power grids; substations; MPLS routing; OpenFlow network technologies; backbone networks; control centers; multiprotocol label switching; next generation communication architectures; smart grid; substations; transmission operations; Communication networks; Generators; Load modeling; Mathematical model; Multiprotocol label switching; Switches; Load management; multiprotocol label switching; network operating system (NOX); networking; openFlow; power system communication;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Smart Grid, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1949-3053
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TSG.2012.2227516
Filename
6476055
Link To Document