• DocumentCode
    858580
  • Title

    Influence of Pinned-Layer Dispersion on Magnetic Tunnel Junction Switching Distributions

  • Author

    Deak, James G.

  • Author_Institution
    NVE Corp., Eden Prairie, MN
  • Volume
    43
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    6/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    2821
  • Lastpage
    2823
  • Abstract
    The influence of pinning field dispersion (PFD) on the coercivity (Hc) and offset field (Ho) of IrMn/NiFeCo/AlOx/NiFeCo magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJ) has been studied by repeated in situ measurement of the resistance as a function of magnetic field, R(H), hysteresis loops of the MTJs after resetting the IrMn/NiFeCo pinned layer. Magneto-thermal magnetic random access memory, MT-MRAM, cells were used to perform this task. Here, the pinned layer is reset by pulsing a current through the tunnel barrier of the MT-MRAM MTJ in the presence of an external magnetic field. This permits rapid field cooling of the pinned layer through the blocking temperature of the IrMn. Repeated measurements of an R(H) loop after a pinned layer reset cycle show only minor variation. R(H) loops measured for different pinned layer reset cycles however, can show large changes in Hc , Ho, and R(H) loop shape. The effect is believed to be due to the random magnetostatic field distribution resulting from the frozen-in PFD of the IrMn/NiFeCo pinning layer. In order to test this conclusion, the evolution of the R(H) loop is studied as a function of reset pulse amplitude. Because of the intrinsic distribution of blocking temperatures of the IrMn layer, PFD should decrease as reset pulse amplitude increases. Results show that Hc increases, while the R(H) loops become more square as the reset pulse amplitude is increased. Ho shows a more complex dependence, which is a competition between ferromagnetic magnetic-roughness-induced Neel coupling and anti-ferromagnetic stray field coupling. A micromagnetic model for studying the dependence of the R(H) loops on the alignment of the IrMn crystallites was developed, and simulated results are in good agreement with the measurements. This work provides a simple explanation for large switching field distributions that can result in arrays of seemingly identical MRAM bits
  • Keywords
    aluminium compounds; antiferromagnetic materials; cobalt alloys; crystallites; ferromagnetic materials; iridium alloys; iron alloys; magnetic cooling; magnetic hysteresis; magnetic multilayers; magnetic storage; magnetic switching; magnetic tunnelling; manganese alloys; micromagnetics; nickel alloys; random-access storage; IrMn-NiFeCo-AlO; MRAM; antiferromagnetic stray field coupling; coercivity; crystallites; ferromagnetic magnetic-roughness-induced Neel coupling; hysteresis loops; magnetic tunnel junction; magnetostatic field distribution; magnetothermal magnetic random access memory; micromagnetic model; pinning field dispersion; rapid field cooling; resistance; switching field distribution; Coercive force; Couplings; Dispersion; Electrical resistance measurement; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic switching; Magnetic tunneling; Magnetostatics; Phase frequency detector; Shape measurement; Antiferromagnet; MRAM; micromagnetic simulation; pinning field dispersion; switching distribution;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMAG.2007.893700
  • Filename
    4202695