DocumentCode
866406
Title
Test sets and reject rates: all fault coverages are not created equal
Author
Maxwell, Peter C. ; Aitken, Robert C.
Author_Institution
Hewlett-Packard Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA
Volume
10
Issue
1
fYear
1993
fDate
3/1/1993 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
42
Lastpage
51
Abstract
The use of stuck-at-fault coverage for estimating overall quality levels is examined. Data from a part tested with both functional and scan tests are analyzed and compared with quality predictions generated by three existing theoretical models. It is shown that reasonable predictions are possible for functional tests, but that scan tests, due to misuse of theoretical equations, produce significantly worse quality levels than predicted.<>
Keywords
fault location; logic testing; fault coverages; functional tests; quality levels; reject rates; scan tests; stuck-at-fault coverage; test sets; Circuit faults; Circuit testing; Clocks; Design engineering; Digital integrated circuits; Economic forecasting; Flip-flops; Integrated circuit testing; Manufacturing; Production;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Design & Test of Computers, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0740-7475
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/54.199804
Filename
199804
Link To Document