DocumentCode
87526
Title
Energy Storage That May Be Too Good to Be True: Comparison Between Wayside Storage and Reversible Thyristor Controlled Rectifiers for Heavy Rail
Author
Gelman, Vitaly
Volume
8
Issue
4
fYear
2013
fDate
Dec. 2013
Firstpage
70
Lastpage
80
Abstract
There has been substantial interest in the traction community for using wayside energy storage systems (ESSs) to better use train braking energy, thus reducing energy costs and peak power as well as voltage stabilization. An alternative solution to reach the same goals is using recuperating (also called reversible) traction power substations such as reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers (RTCRs). This article compares advantages and disadvantages of ESSs of three most common types-flywheels, batteries, and supercapacitors-and recuperating substations. The analysis takes into account size, capital cost, the "round trip" energy losses, and energy savings for heavy rail applications.
Keywords
battery powered vehicles; braking; cost reduction; flywheels; railway electrification; rectifier substations; supercapacitors; thyristor applications; traction power supplies; voltage regulators; RTCR; account size; batteries; called reversible traction power substations; capital cost; energy cost reduction; flywheels; heavy rail applications; peak power reduction; recuperating traction power substations; reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers; round trip energy losses; supercapacitors; traction community; train braking energy; voltage stabilization; wayside energy storage systems; Acceleration; Batteries; Energy storage; Rectifiers; Substations; Supercapacitors; Thyristors;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
1556-6072
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/MVT.2013.2283350
Filename
6658850
Link To Document