• DocumentCode
    87526
  • Title

    Energy Storage That May Be Too Good to Be True: Comparison Between Wayside Storage and Reversible Thyristor Controlled Rectifiers for Heavy Rail

  • Author

    Gelman, Vitaly

  • Volume
    8
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Dec. 2013
  • Firstpage
    70
  • Lastpage
    80
  • Abstract
    There has been substantial interest in the traction community for using wayside energy storage systems (ESSs) to better use train braking energy, thus reducing energy costs and peak power as well as voltage stabilization. An alternative solution to reach the same goals is using recuperating (also called reversible) traction power substations such as reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers (RTCRs). This article compares advantages and disadvantages of ESSs of three most common types-flywheels, batteries, and supercapacitors-and recuperating substations. The analysis takes into account size, capital cost, the "round trip" energy losses, and energy savings for heavy rail applications.
  • Keywords
    battery powered vehicles; braking; cost reduction; flywheels; railway electrification; rectifier substations; supercapacitors; thyristor applications; traction power supplies; voltage regulators; RTCR; account size; batteries; called reversible traction power substations; capital cost; energy cost reduction; flywheels; heavy rail applications; peak power reduction; recuperating traction power substations; reversible thyristor controlled rectifiers; round trip energy losses; supercapacitors; traction community; train braking energy; voltage stabilization; wayside energy storage systems; Acceleration; Batteries; Energy storage; Rectifiers; Substations; Supercapacitors; Thyristors;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Vehicular Technology Magazine, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1556-6072
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MVT.2013.2283350
  • Filename
    6658850