• DocumentCode
    875328
  • Title

    Optimal design, inverse problems and parallel computers

  • Author

    Hoole, S. Ratnajeevan H

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Eng., Harvey Mudd Coll., Claremont, CA, USA
  • Volume
    27
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    1991
  • fDate
    9/1/1991 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    4146
  • Lastpage
    4149
  • Abstract
    Speed has always been a problem in the application of inverse problem methodology in optimal design. This is largely due to the time-consuming operations involved in the computation of gradients with respect to the many parameters. With the advent of parallel computers, this is no longer a problem. The conjugate gradient and Cholesky factorization solution procedures for the computation of gradients in the optimal design of a recording head were compared. It was found that the Cholesky factorization scheme is superior to the conjugate gradient methods in inverse problems if renumbering could be done efficiently to reduce the profile storage. However, when there are limitations in storage, conjugate gradient methods with sparse storage must be used for larger matrices.
  • Keywords
    CAD; conjugate gradient methods; electrical engineering computing; inverse problems; magnetic heads; magnetic recording; optimisation; parallel algorithms; Cholesky factorization; conjugate gradient; inverse problems; matrices; optimal design; parallel computers; profile storage; recording head; sparse storage; Application software; Concurrent computing; Differential equations; Educational institutions; Finite element methods; Gradient methods; Integral equations; Inverse problems; Poisson equations; Sparse matrices;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Magnetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9464
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/20.105014
  • Filename
    105014