• DocumentCode
    88624
  • Title

    Automatic Channel Fault Detection and Diagnosis System for a Small Animal APD-Based Digital PET Scanner

  • Author

    Charest, Jonathan ; Beaudoin, Jean-Francois ; Cadorette, Jules ; Lecomte, Roger ; Brunet, Charles-Antoine ; Fontaine, Rejean

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. Eng. & Comput. Eng., Univ. de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
  • Volume
    62
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Jun-15
  • Firstpage
    1070
  • Lastpage
    1076
  • Abstract
    Fault detection and diagnosis is critical to many applications in order to ensure proper operation and performance over time. Positron emission tomography (PET) systems that require regular calibrations by qualified scanner operators are good candidates for such continuous improvements. Furthermore, for scanners employing one-to-one coupling of crystals to photodetectors to achieve enhanced spatial resolution and contrast, the calibration task is even more daunting because of the large number of independent channels involved. To cope with the additional complexity of the calibration and quality control procedures of these scanners, an intelligent system (IS) was designed to perform fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) of malfunctioning channels. The IS can be broken down into four hierarchical modules: parameter extraction, diagnosis, channel fault detection and fault prioritization. Of these modules, parameter extraction and fault detection have previously been reported and this paper focuses on diagnosis, improved fault detection and fault prioritization. The status diagnosis module will diagnose all channels and propose an explanation of the reasons that lead to the diagnosis. The purpose of the fault prioritization module is to help the operator to zero in on the faults that need immediate attention. The FDD system was implemented on a LabPET avalanche photodiode (APD)-based digital PET scanner. Experiments demonstrated a FDD Sensitivity of 99.9% (with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of [99.6, 100.0]) for major faults. Globally, the balanced accuracy of the diagnosis for varying fault severities is 91%. This suggests the IS can greatly benefit the operators in their maintenance task.
  • Keywords
    avalanche photodiodes; biomedical equipment; calibration; fault diagnosis; photodetectors; positron emission tomography; quality control; FDD Sensitivity; automatic channel fault detection-diagnosis system; calibration task; enhanced spatial resolution; fault prioritization; independent channels; intelligent system; labPET avalanche photodiode-based digital PET scanner; malfunctioning channels; photodetectors; positron emission tomography; quality control procedures; small animal APD-based digital PET scanner; Accuracy; Expert systems; Fault detection; Fuzzy logic; Noise; Positron emission tomography; Sensitivity; Artificial intelligence (AI); biomedical imaging; expert systems; fault diagnosis; fuzzy logic; machine learning; positron emission tomography (PET);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9499
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNS.2015.2425794
  • Filename
    7117476