It is shown that if

and

, there are some binary primitive BCH codes (BCH codes in a narrow sense) of length

whose minimum weight is greater than the BCH bound. This gives a negative answer to the question posed by Peterson [1] of whether or not the BCH bound is always the actual minimum weight of a binary primitive BCH code. It is also shown that for any even

, there are some binary cyclic codes of length

that have more information digits than the primitive BCH codes of length

with the same minimum weight.