• DocumentCode
    928640
  • Title

    Comments on "Choked Gaussian antenna: extremely low sidelobe compact antenna design"

  • Author

    Granet, Christophe ; Bird, Trevor S. ; James, Graeme L.

  • Author_Institution
    Telecommun. & Ind. Phys., CSIRO, Epping, NSW, Australia
  • Volume
    2
  • Issue
    1
  • fYear
    2003
  • fDate
    6/25/1905 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    363
  • Lastpage
    364
  • Abstract
    For original paper see J. Teniente et al., ibid., vol.1, p.200-2 (2002). The original paper draws heavily on our work (Granet, C. et al., IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat., vol.48, p.1125-33, 2000; Bird, T.S. et al., Proc. AP´00 Millennium Conf. Antennas and Propagat., Paper 0085, 2000); our results for the bowl-shaped horn are used as a benchmark for the design process used by Teniente et al. At the outset, we congratulate Jorge Teniente and his co-authors for the excellent results obtained with the choked Gaussian horn. However, some of the comparisons and use of our work are not strictly in context. We address some of the issues raised and comment on the paper. We wish to emphasize that our comments are not a criticism of their work, but are merely a clarification.
  • Keywords
    antenna radiation patterns; horn antennas; satellite antennas; bowl-shaped horn; choked Gaussian antenna; corrugated horn antennas; low sidelobe antenna; radiation patterns; satellite antennas; Antenna radiation patterns; Antennas and propagation; Birds; Earth; Gaussian processes; Horn antennas; Interference; Narrowband; Process design; Satellite antennas;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1536-1225
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/LAWP.2003.820716
  • Filename
    1274895