• DocumentCode
    933600
  • Title

    Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy of the Human Prostate

  • Author

    Halter, Ryan J. ; Hartov, Alex ; Heaney, John A. ; Paulsen, Keith D. ; Schned, Alan R.

  • Author_Institution
    Dartmouth Coll., Hanover
  • Volume
    54
  • Issue
    7
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    7/1/2007 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    1321
  • Lastpage
    1327
  • Abstract
    Tissue electrical impedance is a function of its architecture and has been used to differentiate normal and cancer tissues in a variety of organs including breast, cervix, skin, and bladder. This paper investigates the possibility of differentiating normal and malignant prostate tissue using bioimpedance spectra. A probe was designed to measure impedance spectra over the range of 10 kHz to 1 MHz. The probe was fully characterized using discrete loads and saline solutions of different concentrations. Impedance spectra of five ex vivo prostates were measured in the operating room immediately following radical prostatectomy. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare the normal and malignant findings. The impedance probe had a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) > 84 dB across the entire spectrum and measured a tissue volume of approximately 46 mm3. At 10 kHz, prostate conductivity (sigma) ranged from 0.232 S/m to 0.310 S/m for tumor and from 0.238 S/m to 0.901 S/m for normal tissue. At 1 MHz the ranges were 0.301 S/m to 0.488 S/m for tumor and 0.337 S/m to 1.149 S/m for normal. Prostate permittivity (epsivr) ranged from 6.64 times104 to 1.25 times105 for tumor and from 9.08 times104 to 4.49 times105 for normal tissues at 10 kHz. And, at 1 MHz the er ranges were 9.23 times102 to 1.88 times103 for tumor and 1.16 times103 to 2.18 times103 for normal tissue. Both sigma and epsivr of tumor tissue were found to be significantly lower than that of normal tissue (P < 0.0001). Conductivity and permittivity are both higher in normal prostate tissues than they are in malignant tissue making them suitable parameters for tissue differentiation. This is in agreement with trends observed in other tissues reported in much of the literature. Expanded studies are needed to further validate this finding and to explore the biological mechanism responsible for gene- - rating the results.
  • Keywords
    biological tissues; biomedical engineering; cancer; electric impedance imaging; patient diagnosis; permittivity; Wilcoxon signed rank test; bioimpedance spectra; bladder; breast; cancer tissue; cervix; electrical impedance spectroscopy; human prostate; malignant prostate tissue; radical prostatectomy; skin; tissue differentiation; tissue electrical impedance; tumor; Breast; Cervical cancer; Conductivity; Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Humans; Impedance measurement; Neoplasms; Permittivity; Probes; Skin; Cancer screening; electrical impedance spectroscopy; prostate cancer; tissue electrical properties; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Electric Impedance; Humans; Male; Plethysmography, Impedance; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.2007.897331
  • Filename
    4237338