DocumentCode
956725
Title
Comments, with reply, on "Dose perturbation by wafer charging during ion implantation" by Y. Sato et al
Author
White, Nicholas R.
Author_Institution
Diamond Semicond. Group Inc., Gloucester, MA, USA
Volume
6
Issue
3
fYear
1993
Firstpage
268
Lastpage
269
Abstract
The commenter remarks on a statement in the above-titled work by Y. Sato et al., (ibid., vol.5, no.4, pp.329-336, Nov. 1992) concerning a study that the commenter co-authored (M.E. Mack et al., 1985). The statement is that the latter work suggests that beam blowup resulting from wafer charging does not disturb dose control of adjacent wafers in the vicinity of the charging wafer, unlike their own observations. The commenter clarifies this work and argues that the gross dose errors reported by Y. Sato et al. are caused by blowup of the beam through loss of space-charge neutralization over at least 1-m distance. He points out that the use of the flood gun with biased aperture ameliorates the problem. The original authors respond by defending their results.<>
Keywords
ion implantation; semiconductor doping; beam blowup; biased aperture; dose control; flood gun; ion implantation; space-charge neutralization; wafer charging; Apertures; Electrodes; Electrons; Floods; Ion beams; Ion implantation; Manufacturing industries; Resists; Substrates; Time measurement;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Semiconductor Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0894-6507
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/66.238175
Filename
238175
Link To Document