DocumentCode
981044
Title
Choosing the number of faces of a phased-array antenna for hemisphere scan coverage
Author
Knittel, George H.
Author_Institution
Wheeler Laboratories, Inc., Smithtown, NY, USA
Volume
13
Issue
6
fYear
1965
fDate
11/1/1965 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
878
Lastpage
882
Abstract
Phased-array antennas utilizing fixed, planar apertures and designed to provide electronic-beam scanning throughout a hemisphere require a minimum of 3 apertures or faces. Each face covers one-third of the hemisphere and scans to an angle
from broadside. This causes a ratio of broadside beamwidth to maximum-scan beamwidth of 0.45. Also, assuming no power reflected from the aperture broadside scan, a large amount of power would be reflected at maximum scan because of mutual coupling. These two effects cause a variation in realized gain of 4.1 db. By using 4, 5, or even 6 faces to scan the hemisphere, the antenna performance may be considerably improved. Each face of the 6-face array scans to an angle of only
from broadside, and exhibits a beamwidth ratio of only 0.76. The power reflected from the aperture is greatly reduced, and the variation in realized gain is only 1.3 dB. The relative number of elements required by the various designs depends on the particular basis of comparison. Equalizing poorest performance by specifying equal realized gains at the respective maximum scan angles requires about 18 percent more elements for 3 faces than for 6 faces. Three of the four chosen bases for comparison yielded fewest elements for the 4-face array.
from broadside. This causes a ratio of broadside beamwidth to maximum-scan beamwidth of 0.45. Also, assuming no power reflected from the aperture broadside scan, a large amount of power would be reflected at maximum scan because of mutual coupling. These two effects cause a variation in realized gain of 4.1 db. By using 4, 5, or even 6 faces to scan the hemisphere, the antenna performance may be considerably improved. Each face of the 6-face array scans to an angle of only
from broadside, and exhibits a beamwidth ratio of only 0.76. The power reflected from the aperture is greatly reduced, and the variation in realized gain is only 1.3 dB. The relative number of elements required by the various designs depends on the particular basis of comparison. Equalizing poorest performance by specifying equal realized gains at the respective maximum scan angles requires about 18 percent more elements for 3 faces than for 6 faces. Three of the four chosen bases for comparison yielded fewest elements for the 4-face array.Keywords
Phased arrays; Spherical antennas; Antenna arrays; Aperture antennas; Degradation; Mutual coupling; Performance gain; Phase shifters; Polarization; Radar antennas; Radar applications; Telephony;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-926X
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TAP.1965.1138580
Filename
1138580
Link To Document