DocumentCode :
992099
Title :
Analysis and Measurements of Magnetic Field Exposures for Healthcare Workers in SelectedMR Environments
Author :
Fuentes, Miguel A. ; Trakic, Adnan ; Wilson, Stephen J. ; Crozier, Stuart
Author_Institution :
Univ. of Queensland, St. Lucia
Volume :
55
Issue :
4
fYear :
2008
fDate :
4/1/2008 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage :
1355
Lastpage :
1364
Abstract :
There are concerns about workers repeatedly exposed to magnetic fields exceeding regulatory limits with respect to modern magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, there is need for an ambulatory magnetic field dosimeter capable of measuring these fields in and around an MRI scanner in order to evaluate the regulatory guidelines and determine any underlying exposure risks. This study presents results of tri-axial measurements using an ambulatory magnetic field dosimeter worn by workers during normal working shifts. We recorded and analyzed magnetic field exposures in and around 1.5 T, 2 T, and 4 T magnets during routine patient procedures. The data was integrated and averaged over time and evaluated against the latest exposure standards. Time-varying magnetic fields occur when individuals move through spatially non-uniform static magnetic fields or during gradient-pulsed magnetic fields or a combination of both. Our previous numerical analysis shows that at certain positions surrounding the MRI scanner ends, such fields may induce current densities and electric fields that may exceed the relevant EU, ICNIRP, and IEEE standards. A high-speed acquisition version of the dosimeter measured gradient-pulsed fields at positions accessible by MRI workers near the scanner ends, and the results were evaluated and compared against the numerical simulations and the standards. Our measurements confirm that workers can be exposed to magnetic fields exceeding the guidelines at positions near the gradient coil ends during clinical imaging and a high degree of correlation exists with the numerical results. While the time-weighted average magnetic field exposures in 1.5 T, 2 T, and 4 T were all within the regulatory limits during static magnetic field measurements, the peak limits for the head can be exceeded in some circumstances. This study presents a small number of routine shifts of data that provide indicative results of magnetic field exposure in real situations.
Keywords :
biological effects of fields; biomagnetism; biomedical MRI; dosimetry; health care; occupational health; ambulatory magnetic field dosimeter; gradient-pulsed magnetic fields; healthcare workers; magnetic field exposures; magnetic flux density 1.5 T; magnetic flux density 2 T; magnetic flux density 4 T; magnetic resonance imaging; spatially nonuniform static magnetic fields; static magnetic field measurements; time-varying magnetic fields; Current density; Guidelines; Magnetic analysis; Magnetic field measurement; Magnetic fields; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnets; Medical services; Numerical analysis; Position measurement; Dosimetry; MRI Safety; MRI safety; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Australia; Body Burden; Electromagnetic Fields; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Maximum Allowable Concentration; Medical Staff; Occupational Exposure; Radiation Dosage; Radiation Monitoring; Radiation Protection; Relative Biological Effectiveness; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9294
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TBME.2007.913410
Filename :
4390964
Link To Document :
بازگشت