ترور و تفكر؛ از هابرماس و چامسكي تا دريدا (نقدي شكلي و محتوايي بر كتاب ترور و تفكر)

Terror and contemplation; from habermas and Chomsky to Derrida (A formal and content critique of the book 'terror and contemplation')

در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻘﺪ و ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺗﺮور و ﺗﻔﮑﺮ در آراي اﯾﮕﻠﺘﻮن، ﻫﺎﺑﺮﻣـﺎس، درﯾﺪا و ﭼﺎﻣﺴﮑﯽ در ﮐﺘﺎب «ﺗــﺮور و ﺗﻔﮑــﺮ» ﭘـﺮداﺧﺘﯿﻢ. ﮐﺘﺎب ﺣﺎﺿﺮ از آن ﺟﻬﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺣــﺎوي دﯾﺪﮔﺎه ﻫﺎي ﻣﺘﻔﺎوت و ﮔﺎﻫﺎً ﻣﺘﻀﺎدي درﺑﺎره دو واژه ﺑﺤﺚ ﺑﺮاﻧﮕﯿﺰ در اﻧﺪﯾﺸﮥ ﺳﯿﺎﺳﯽ (ﺗﺮور و ﺗﻔﮑﺮ) ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ، ﺧﻮاﻧﻨﺪه را در ﻣﻌﺮض ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﺗﺌﻮرﯾﮏ درﺑﺎره ﯾﮏ ﭘﺪپده واﺣﺪ (ﻧﻈﯿﺮ واﻗﻌﮥ 11 ﺳﭙﺘﺎﻣﺒﺮ) ﻗﺮار ﻣﯽ دﻫﺪ و ﺑﺪﯾﻦ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ، ذﻫﻨﯿﺖ ﭘﯿﭽﯿﺪه اي ﺑـﺮاي ﺧﻮاﻧﻨﺪﮔﺎن اﯾﺠﺎد ﻣﯽ ﮔﺮدد ﺗﺎ در ﺑﺎب ﭘﺪﯾﺪه ﻫﺎي ﭘﯿﭽﯿﺪه اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺗﺄﻣﻞ ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮي ﻧﻤﺎﯾﻨـﺪ. در ﻧﻘـﺪي ﮐﻠﯽ ﺗﻤﺎم دﯾﺪﮔﺎه ﻫﺎي ﻓﻮق (ﻫﺮ ﮐﺪام از ﻣﻨﻈﺮي ﺧﺎص)، ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﻧﮕﺎري ﯾﮏ واﻗﻌـﮥ ﺗﺮورﯾﺴﺘﯽ ﺑﺎ اﺷﮑﺎﻻﺗﯽ رو ﺑﻪ رو ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﺮﻗﺮاري ﻧﺴﺒﺖ ﻣﯿﺎن ﺗﺮور و ﺗﻔﮑﺮ و ﺑﻪ ﺗﺒـﻊ آن درك ﯾﮏ ﭘﺪﯾﺪه ﺑﺎ اﺑﻌﺎد ﻣﺘﻔﺎوت آن ﻣﯽ ﮔﺮدد ﮐﻪ در ﻧﻘﺪﻫﺎي اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪه ﺗـﻼش ﮔﺮدﯾـﺪه ﺗـﺎ ﺑـﻪ آن ﭘﺮداﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﻮد.

In this article we have dealt with a critique and on the relationship between terror and contemplation based on the Eagleton, Derrida, Chamsky' viewpoints in the book" terror and contemplation". Since the present book is pivoted around different and sometimes opposite viewpoints about a controversial idea in political science( terror and contemplation), the reader is introduced with a theoretical challenge about a single phenomenon ( such as September 11th event); therefore, a complicated mentality is provided for readers to reflect more on the twisted societal phenomena. In a general criticism, all of the above_mentioned viewpoints about a historiograghy of a terrorist event ( each one from a specific perspective) have their own defects, and this has been acting as a block against making a comparison between terror and contemplation and consequently, having an understanding of a phenomenon with different dimensions that in the critiques that has been made we have tried to deal with them.