زمينه و هدف: ارائه خدمات با كيفيت در بخش بهداشت و درمان، از مهمترين اولويتهاي نظام سلامت است. ازآنجاييكه سازمان بيمارستان برجستهترين بخش در نظام سلامت است، كيفيت ارائه شده در اين سازمان نمود بيشتري از ديدگاه ارائهدهنده و بيمار دارد. هدف اين مطالعه بررسي اولويتبندي و ميزان توافق نظر ارائهدهندگان و گيرندگان خدمات بيمارستاني در 6 بعد (نيروي انساني، تجهيزات و فضاي فيزيكي، اطلاعات و ارتباطات و آموزش، دسترسي به خدمات و مراقبت، احترام به ارزشها و حمايت عاطفي، مديريت و هماهنگي سيستم) بوده است.
مواد و روشها: در اين مطالعه توصيفي- مقطعي معيارهاي كيفيت در خدمات بيمارستاني در استان قزوين از ديدگاه 377 نفر از ارائهدهندگان و گيرندگان خدمات مورد بررسي قرار گرفت. نمونه گيري از طريق نمونه گيري چندمرحله اي انجام شد. ابزار گردآوري دادهها پرسشنامه محققساخته تعيين معيار كيفيت خدمات بيمارستاني بود كه به بررسي ديدگاههاي ارائهدهندگان و گيرندگان خدمات ميپرداخت. محتواي پرسشنامه از طريق روايي محتوايي با استفاده از شاخص نسبت رواني محتوي تفسير گرديده و مواردهايي با سطح معناداري (0/05
چكيده لاتين :
Background and objective: Providing health services is one of the most important priorities of a health system. Since the hospital organization is the prominent sector in a health system, the quality of services has higher impact from the point of view of service providers and patients. The aim of this was to study the prioritization and agreement of hospital service providers and receivers towards 6 dimensions- human resources, equipment and physical space, information, communication and training, access to service and care, respect towards values and emotional support, and system management and coordination.
Materials and methods: In this descriptive-analytical study the quality criteria of hospital services from the perspective of 377 service providers and receivers were studied. Samples were selected using multi-stage sampling. Data was collected by a researcher-made questionnaire to prioritize quality standards from the point of view of service providers and receivers. The content of the questionnaire was confirmed using content, with acceptable significant level (p < 0.05). Data were analyzed using chi-square in SPSS 17.
Results: The most agreement in six dimensions were allocated to dimension of human resource including sub dimensions as knowledge, expertise, and skills of physicians, nurses and other caregivers (80%). In human resource dimension, both service providers and recipients had the same opinion on the first and second priorities. In dimension of equipment and physical space, information, communication and education, emotional support and respect for the values both service providers and recipient were agreed on the second and third priorities.
Conclusion: Determination of quality criteria according to the views of service providers and receivers on various communities with regard to social, economic and cultural is very important. Therefore, it is desirable to start plan the health services, particularly hospital services to be noted. By setting quality standards and incorporate it in the assessment and accreditation of hospitals can ensure to achieve the goal of improving the quality of hospital services.