كليدواژه :
نقد جامعهشناختي , جلال آلاحمد , سهتار و عناصر داستان , شگردهاي زيباييشناختي , نقد جامعه شناختي داستان سه تار جلال آل احمد
چكيده فارسي :
آثار ادبي دوره بيداري و بعد از مشروطه جنبه اجتماعي و سياسي فراواني دارند و ميتوان آنها را از ديدگاه جامعهشناختي نقد و بررسي كرد. سهتار جلال آلاحمد ازجملۀ اين آثار است. در اين مقاله، روش نقد داستان، تلفيقي و تركيبي و با تحليل محتواي اجتماعي اثر و بررسي جنبههاي فني و زيباييشناختي آن همراه بوده است تا نشان دهد نويسنده چگونه عناصر فني داستاننويسي و شگردهاي زيباييشناختي ادبي را به كار گرفته است تا انديشههاي اجتماعي و موضوعاتي مانند افراطيگري، تضاد طبقاتي، باورها و سنتهاي غلط و علايق انساني را بيان كند. آلاحمد از عناصري مانند شخصيتپردازي، كشمكش و توصيف و شگردهاي ادبي چون بيان طنزآميز، تكرار، پارادوكس و تشبيه كمك گرفته و انديشههاي خود را با هنر آميخته است تا داستان خود را اثرگذار و جذاب كند. اميد است اين نوع پژوهشها بتوانند نقدهاي تلفيقي و چندجانبه را كه نسبت به نقدهاي تكبعدي كاملتر و جامعترند، گسترش دهند و جايگاه خود را در پژوهشهاي ادبي بيابند.
چكيده لاتين :
The Setar is a short story written by Jalal Al-e-Ahmad. This article, with an eclectic and combined method, aims at criticizing technical and aesthetic aspect of the work along with its social content, to show how the author utilized these elements in order to express social thoughts. Al-e-Ahmad is not an introverted writer who has fallen into his own minds and is ignorant of what goes on in society. He is a social and realistic person. The Setar represents part of the author's thoughts and criticizes him for some social damage, albeit indirectly, with the effect of satirical taste. The author depicts the conflict among religious extremist group, fanatical superficial observers, and one-dimensional artists, and, of course, guides the story in such a way to criticize the unaware, worldly, and fanatical religious group and provokes the reader to sympathize with the boy who plays setar (a music tool). In fact, the author complaints more about bigotry and instrumental utilization of religion and considers its adverse consequences as destructive. It is also a show of wealth and well-being of a number of people and the poverty of another group.In addition, the author criticizes beliefs and prejudices that have entered the society in the name of religion that must be broken and moderated. Human interest is a social issue that is of utmost importance in short stories. The writer is indifferent to the society and the educational system, human interests, contradictions and inconsistencies, and false calculations in his work.
Characterization, tune, spatiation, description, conflict, suspension, complication and resolution, how to begin and end the story and other techniques of story writing, along with literary techniques, give a unique representation to the story, and make it interesting in terms of form and content. The element of ‘waiting’ which is considered to be the most important feature of the story, is extremely high. Al-e-Ahmadartistically utilized literary techniques such as humorous expression, repetition, paradox and simile and mixed his thoughts to art to make his story influential. The bitter satire used by the author to express social issues has made the story very attractive.It is hoped that this article could be a pattern, though incomplete, for similar cases and would complement and refine the next-generation scholars in order to provide more context for interaction between researchers in the fields of literature and sociology.