بررسي مشكلات پژوهشي و موانع توليد علم از ديدگاه اعضاي هيات علمي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي سمنان

Viewpoints of faculty members of Semnan University of Medical Sciences about research barriers

ﺳﺎﺑﻘﻪ و ﻫﺪف: ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺻﺤﯿﺢ و ﺗﻌﺮﯾﻒ ﺷﺪه از ﻣﻮاﻧﻊ ﺗﻮﻟﯿﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ، اوﻟﯿﻦ و ﻣﻬﻢ ﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻗﺪم از ﺗـﻼش ﻫـﺎي ﻻزم ﺟﻬـﺖ ﺗﺴﺮﯾﻊ ﺷﺘﺎب ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﮐﺸﻮر و رﺳﯿﺪن ﺑﻪ اﻫﺪاف ﺳﻨﺪ ﭼﺸﻢ اﻧﺪاز و ﻧﻘﺸﮥ ﺟﺎﻣﻊ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﮐﺸﻮر ﻣﯽ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌـﻪ ﺣﺎﺿـﺮ ﺑـﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﺸﮑﻼت ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ و ﻣﻮاﻧﻊ ﺗﻮﻟﯿﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ از ﻧﻈﺮ اﻋﻀﺎي ﻫﯿﺄت ﻋﻠﻤﯽ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﭘﺰﺷـﮑﯽ ﺳـﻤﻨﺎن اﻧﺠـﺎم ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﻣﻮاد و روش ﻫﺎ: اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻘﻄﻌﯽ در ﺳﺎل 1391 ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﻣﻮاﻧﻊ ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ از دﯾـﺪﮔﺎه اﻋﻀـﺎء ﻫﯿـا ت ﻋﻠﻤـﯽ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﭘﺰﺷﮑﯽ ﺳﻤﻨﺎن اﻧﺠﺎم ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ 88 ﻧﻔﺮ از اﻋﻀﺎء ﻫﯿﺎت ﻋﻠﻤـي ﺗﻤـﺎم وﻗـﺖ ﺷـﺎﻏﻞ در داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻋﻠﻮم ﭘﺰﺷﮑﯽ ﺑﻮد. در ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﻃﺮاﺣﯽ ﺷﺪه، ﮔﻮﯾﻪ ﻫﺎي ﻣﻮاﻧﻊ ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ، ﻣﺸﺘﻤﻞ ﺑﺮ 39 ﺳﻮال ﭼﻬﺎر ﮔﺰﯾﻨـﻪ اي در ﻣﻘﯿﺎس 5 ﮔﺰﯾﻨﻪ اي ﻟﯿﮑﺮت ﺑﻮده اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ از ﻣﻮاﻓﻘﺖ ﺧﯿﻠﯽ ﮐﻢ ﺗﺎ ﻣﻮاﻓﻘﺖ ﺧﯿﻠﯽ زﯾﺎد ﺗﻨﻈﯿﻢ ﺷﺪه ﺑﻮد. ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎﺳـﺦ ﻫـﺎي ﺧﯿﻠﯽ ﮐﻢ، ﮐﻢ، ﻣﺘﻮﺳﻂ، زﯾﺎد و ﺧﯿﻠﯽ زﯾﺎد ﻫﺮ ﯾﮏ از ﮔﻮﯾﻪ ﻫﺎ، ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ ﻧﻤﺮات 1 ﺗﺎ 5 داده ﺷﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ ﻫﺎ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داد، ﻣﯿﺎﻧﮕﯿﻦ (± اﻧﺤﺮاف ﻣﻌﯿﺎر) ﻧﻤﺮات ﺣﯿﻄﻪ ﺗﻬﯿﻪ و ﺗﺪوﯾﻦ ﻃﺮح ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ 0/26±1/93، ﺣﯿﻄﻪ ﻣﺸﮑﻼت در اﺟﺮاي ﻃﺮح 0/35±232، ﺣﯿﻄﻪ اداري و ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﯽ 0/26±2/68 و ﺣﯿﻄﻪ ﻓﺮدي 0/22±3/24 ﺑـﻮده اﺳـﺖ. درﺟﻪ ﻣﺎﻧﻊ ﺑﻮدن ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ در ﭼﻬﺎر ﺣﯿﻄﻪ ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﻌﻨﯽ دار داﺷﺖ (0/001

Introduction: Proper understanding and definition of barriers knowledge production is the first and most important step in the effort necessary momentum to accelerate scientific and comprehensive plan goals and visions of the country. The present study has been done to investigate the problems and barriers to scientific research of the faculty members of Semnan University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). Materials and Methods: This cross sectional study conducted on 88 faculty members in SUMS in 2013. Data collection tools, including demographic information and questionnaire research barriers in Likert scale ranging from very extreme disagreement to extreme agreement scoring from 1 to 5. Results: The results showed the mean (±SD) in area of preparing research proposals was 1.93±0.26, problems implementing the research steps 2.32±0.35, administrative and management 2.68 ± 0.26 and individual factors was 3.24 ± 0.22. The four domains of the five research areas were significant differences (p<0.001). Individual factors were considered the most barriers in research. Overall, 88.6% researchers stated that individual, 6.8% administrative and management and 4.5% research performing factors are the most important barriers to research activity and knowledge production in SUMS. There were no significant differences concerning basic and clinical, work situation, men and women researchers (p>0.05). Conclusion: Faculty members considered individual factors as the most barriers factor in research work. Therefore more attention most is paid to individual and motivational factors of faculty members in order to decrease research challenges and stepping toward the goal for university settings in achieving the highest scientific knowledge production in the region.