تداوم عدالت تبعيض‌آميز و مناسبات حقوقي ديوان كيفري بين‌المللي و شوراي امنيت

The Continuation of Discriminatory Justice and Legal Relationships Between the International Criminal Court and the Security Council

شوراي امنيت كه به استناد منشور ملل متحد، مسئول اوليه حفظ صلح و امنيت بين‌المللي است، براي مجازات جانيان بزرگ بين‌المللي به‌منظور حفظ يا تثبيت صلح، محاكم كيفري بين‌المللي نظير ديوان‌هاي كيفري بين‌المللي يوگسلاوي سابق و رواندا را تشكيل داده است. ديوان كيفري بين‌المللي نيز به‌ منظور مبارزه با بي‌كيفري جانيان بزرگ تشكيل شده است. وظايف متداخل اين دو نهاد و غفلت شوراي امنيت از مسئوليت اوليه خود در منشور، زمينه مداخله شورا در ديوان مذكور و عدم تحقق عدالت كيفري بين‌المللي را فراهم نموده و رويه عدالت مبتني بر تبعيض را در حوزه حقوق بين‌الملل كيفري استمرار بخشيده است. اين مقاله، ضمن مطالعه و بررسي روابط بين دو نهاد بين‌المللي مذكور، به اين نتيجه رسيده است كه روابط شورا و ديوان كيفري بين‌المللي به‌جاي مداقه در عدالت كيفري بين‌المللي، سياست و صلح و امنيت بين‌المللي را مدنظر دارد.

Under the UN Charter, the Security Council is the primarily responsible organ for keeping international peace and security. For this end, it has taken a variety of actions, one of which is the establishment of international criminal courts such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. The purpose of these courts is to punish international criminals to maintain or stabilize peace. In addition, International Criminal Court has been established to combat impunity of great criminals. Overlapping functions of these two, on the one hand, and the dependency of International Criminal Courts on States and the Security Council together with the negligence on the part of the Security Council in its primary responsibility given by the Charter, on the other, underlie the interference of the Security Council in jurisdiction of the mentioned courts and lead to the non-realization of international criminal justice and the perpetuate continuation of justice practice based on discrimination in international criminal law. This article aims to study the relationship between these two important international institutions and has come to this conclusion that in their interrelationship, the priority is given to the promotion of international peace and security over universal criminal justice.