زمينه و هدف: با توجه به شيوع بالاي اختلال هاي اضطرابي و افسردگي در دانشجويان و نقش انعطاف ناپذيري روانشناختي در طيف وسيعي از مسائل روانشناختي، پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقايسه مؤلفه هاي انعطاف ناپذيري روانشناختي در دانشجويان مبتلا به اختلالات افسردگي اساسي، اضطراب فراگير، اضطراب اجتماعي و دانشجويان عادي انجام گرفت.
مواد و روش ها: در اين پژوهش توصيفي، 30 فرد مبتلا به افسردگي اساسي، 30 فرد مبتلا به اضطراب فراگير و 30 فرد مبتلا به اضطراب اجتماعي به روش نمونه گيري هدفمند و 30 فرد بههنجار به روش نمونه گيري در دسترس، از بين دانشجويان دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تبريز انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات مورد نياز از طريق پرسشنامه هاي مشخصات جمعيتشناختي و مقياس ارزيابي جامع فرآيندهاي درمان پذيرش و تعهد گردآوري شد. به منظور تجزيه و تحليل دادهها از تحليل واريانس چند متغيره و Scheffe test استفاده شد.
يافته ها: نتايج پژوهش نشان داد كه افراد بههنجار در تمام مولفه هاي انعطاف ناپذيري روانشناختي نمرات پايينتري از سه گروه بيمار كسب كردند (0/001
چكيده لاتين :
Background and Objectives: According to the high prevalence of anxiety and depression disorders in college students and
the role of psychological inflexibility in a wide range of psychological issues, the present study was conducted aiming at
comparing components of psychological inflexibility in students with major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety
disorder, social anxiety disorder and normal students.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, 30 individuals with major depression disorder, 30 individuals with
generalized anxiety disorder and 30 individuals with social anxiety disorder were selected through purposive sampling and 30
normal individuals by available sampling method among students of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in the 2017-2018
academic year. The required information was collected through demographic characteristics questionnaire and the
comprehensive assessment of acceptance and commitment therapy processes. MANOVA and Scheffe’s test were used to
analyze data.
Results: The findings of this study showed that normal individuals got significantly lower scores in all components of
psychosocial inflexibility (p<0.001). Among the three groups of patients, depressed individuals got significantly higher
scores in the cognitive fusion and experiential avoidance component (F=240.37, p<0.001) and patients with generalized
anxiety disorder got significantly higher scores in the self-conceptualized and past and future domination component
(F=108.76, p<0.001).
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, it seems that the components of psychological inflexibility can be
considered as important factors in the psychopathology of individuals with depression and anxiety disorders.