بيداري اسلامي و الگوي حكومت‌داري تركي

Islamic Uprising and the Pattern of Turkish Government

موج عدالت‌خواهي نسيم آزادي در اواخر سال 2011م سرزمين­ هاي عربي را در نورديد و تعدادي از رژيم ­هاي عرب منطقه را ساقط كرد. اين جريان هنوز هم، ساير كشورهاي منطقۀ خاورميانه و شمال آفريقا را تهديد مي­كند، حال بايد منتظر بود و ديد كه گروه­هاي سازمان­يافته و متشكل اسلام­گرا در صدد پياده كردن كدام الگوي سياسي‌‌اند ؟ مقالۀ حاضر با تكيه بر روش توصيفي- تحليلي به دنبال پاسخ دادن به اين پرسش اصلي است كه آيا تركيه مي­تواند مدلي براي كشورهاي خاورميانه و شمال آفريقا باشد يا دست‌كم در حد الگوي موفقي مي­تواند مورد اقتباس قرار گيرد؟ پژوهش­هاي پيشين نشان مي­دهد كه تركيه مي­تواند الگويي براي كشورهاي منطقه باشد؛ با اين حال، فرضيۀ مقاله سرمشق قرار گرفتن تركيه را به دليل تفاوت­هاي تاريخي و ساختاري آن با كشورهاي عربي و بحران­هاي پيش­رو در اين جوامع، صرفاً در حد الگو (به معناي اخص آن) مي­داند و به مدل بودن آن اعتقادي ندارد.

With the expression of the modernization theory as the dominant paradigm of development during the 1950s, approaches towards development were extracted from this paradigm. But with the birth of the attachment school of thought, the modernization theory was scrutinized. For Latin American countries however, the attachment school of thought was considered a Marxist ideology up until the end of the Cold War. Towards the end of the Cold War, and with the changes that took place in the international system, Marxist visions, including the attachment school of thought were also scrutinized due to a lack of resources. Latin American countries were able to distance themselves from the attachment system, and instead establish proper relations with advanced countries that helped their development. The aim of this study is examine and criticize common visions regarding the development of Latin American countries after the Cold War era. According to the findings in this paper, Latin American countries are advancing towards growth and development through their approaches to structural and institutional globalization of economics.