پديد آورندگان :
عابدي، اكبر دانشگاه هنر اسلامي تبريز - دانشكده هنرهاي كاربردي - گروه باستان سنجي و مرمت , رازاني، مهدي دانشگاه هنر اسلامي تبريز - دانشكده هنرهاي كاربردي - گروه باستان سنجي و مرمت , باقرزاده كثيري، مسعود دانشگاه هنر اسلامي تبريز - دانشكده هنرهاي كاربردي - گروه باستان سنجي و مرمت , وثوق، بهرام دانشگاه پيام نور تبريز , اشتاينيگر، دانيل موسسه باستانشناسي آلمان , ابراهيمي، قادر دانشگاه محقق اردبيلي
كليدواژه :
ابسيدين , منابع بومي , فلورسانس اشعه ايكس (XRF) , معدن تجرق بزقوش ميانه , معدن قزلجه , بستان آباد
چكيده فارسي :
دست افزارهاي ابسيديني از فراوانترين مصنوعاتي هستند كه در محوطههاي باستاني خاورميانه و خاورنزديك يافت ميگردند. منشأيابي ابزارهاي ابسيدين از موضوعات جذاب و مورد بحث در ميان باستانشناسان و زمينشناسان است. از آنجايي كه مطالعات فراواني بر روي منشأيابي معادن ابزارهاي سنگي ابسيديني در مناطق همجوار ايران مانند آناتولي و قفقاز انجام گرفته است، لذا بخشهاي عمدهاي از ايران به عنوان يك وقفه مطالعاتي در باستانشناسي خاورميانه از بابت مطالعات منشأيابي ابزارها و معادن ابسيدين به شمار مي آيد. مطالعات اخير ِمعادن و منابع ابسيدينِ ايران و نيز منشايابي ابزارهاي سنگي فراوان ابسيديني، زمينه مساعدي جهت ايجاد يك پايگاه اطلاعاتي و ترسيم افقي پژوهشي را براي مطالعات ابسيدين منطقه فراهم ساخته است. در اين پژوهش با هدف معرفي گروه هاي جديد ابسيديني در خاورميانه و بخش ايران 10 نمونه ابسيدين از منابع شناسايي شده اخير در منطقه تجرق ميانه و قزلجه بستانآباد و اطراف كوههاي بزقوش با استفاده از روش آناليز pXRF به روش قابل حمل ارائه گرديده است. به نحوي كه 8 نمونه از منبع ابسيدين تجرق ميانه و 2 نمونه از منبع قزلجه شهريار بستان آباد انتخاب و مورد آناليز قرار گرفتند. نتايج مطالعات و تجزيه و تحليل داده ها نشان داد سه گروه عمده جديد ابسيدين قابل تفكيك و شناسايي است كه تحت عنوان گروه ابسيديني A و B تجرق ميانه و گروه منبع قزلجه شهريار بستان آباد معرفي مي گردند. اين يافته ها نخستين نمونه هاي ابسيديني شناسايي شده ايران در ارتباط با منابع و منشايابي نمونه هاي تاريخي و باستاني هستند كه زمين هاي جهت مطالعه و مقايسه اين منابع با يافته هاي باستاني و منشاهاي مختلف محتمل داخلي و خارجي را فراهم خواهند ساخت.
چكيده لاتين :
Obsidian is a dark glass formed by very rapid solidification of volcanic lava, but in the
archaeological view, this volcanic glass is an important source for prehistoric tool-making and
artifacts such as arrowhead, point, flake, blade, hand axes, micro-blades and etc. Therefore,
obsidian artifacts are frequently used material in prehistory and found widely in archaeological sites
around the world. The provenance study of obsidian has been an issue of intense research and
debate between archeaometrist and geologists. Hence, different provenance studies carried out in
Anatolia and Caucasus since 1960s up to 2015, but the obsidian research in Iran is in very early
stage and consider as terra incognita. According to the occurrence of lithic obsidian artifacts in
most of the prehistoric archaeological sites in north-west of Iran have been recovered during last
decades, various questions have been rise on the subject of the provenance of these materials. New
studies on prehistoric obsidian artifacts have been done by other scholar specially Iranians during
the recent years, where the main part of these studies focus on the characterization and
classification of the obsidian artifacts by chemical analysis, in order to find an evidence of sourcing
and provenance. More recent research showed that some obsidian tools might have come from
unknown sources located in Iran (perhaps Sahand and Sabalan Mountain). This paper will try to
discuss the new obsidian mine in north-west Iran in western Asia. After a brief introduction of
obsidian studies in north-west Iran, the paper addresses preliminary report of recent researches that
took place concerning 10 local obsidian mine samples from Tajaraq of Miyaneh and Ghizilja of
Bostababad, around of Bozghoosh Mountain in the skirt of Sahand volcano. This study was
realized by portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF), as a non-distractive technique for elemental
analysis, to differentiate between local obsidian mine. From 10 mine samples, 8 samples from
Tajaraq of Miyaneh and 2 samples of Ghizilja of Bostanabad were selected and analyzed. This mine
samples could be consider as the first obsidian source specimens in association with prehistoric
lithic artifacts of north-west Iran and give the chance for detail and comparative studies of these
sources with prehistoric site artifacts for provenance studies, as local or imported materials to this
part of Iran. The research has been carried out with a focus on locating the origins and resources of
obsidian procurement in the northwest of Iran, in order to rethink and reconstruct the regional and
supra-regional trade and exchange networks in future. The project clearly identified the three
groups of geochemically different obsidians named Tajaraq A, Tajaraq B, and Ghizilja. Due to the
fact that Tajaraq obsidian is of a higher quality than the Ghizilja ones, it seems likely that the
samples of Tajaraq obsidians have had the ability to be used for tool-making in the past, as the
samples of Ghizilja, Bostanabad are too fragile and perlitic in structure. Hence, as the two groups
of Tajaraq A and Tajaraq B have the ability to be used for ancient tools in all probability, they can
be introduced as candidates for obsidian mining in prehistoric times in the northwest of Iran. In
fact, the proposed hypothesis is still at a very early stage and future scientific studies and field
research have to be followed. Comparing the new results with prehistoric sites in the cultural areas
of Miyaneh and Bostanabad, it becomes obvious that the Tajaraq B obsidian overlaps in some trace
elements with published data Anatolian sources. If this overlap could be found also by comparing
other elements and their combination, and if it will be confirmed by other methods in future, it
could lead to a complete review of all previous obsidian analysis from Iran. In other words, several
samples that were up to now thought to be from Anatolia could come in reality from source B of
Tajaraq. This is a serious and peculiar hypothesis, which means, at first step, more data have to be
collected at the geological outcrops and especially, by analyzing the archaeological finds from well
stratified context. The implications of the findings will discuss along with limitations and future
research directions.