كليدواژه :
هنر ناتمام , نقاشي غربي , مجسمه سازي , كمينه گرايي
چكيده فارسي :
هدف از نگارش مقاله حاضر بررسي ساختار بصري آثاري است كه به صورت ناتمام در هنر نقاشي و مجسمه سازي غرب، توسط هنرمندان، در زمان هاي مختلف و شيوه هاي متعدد شكل گرفته است و سرانجام تاثير به سزايي بر «نظريات روشنفكران غربي» گذاشته است. در اين كنكاش در پي آنيم كه: آيا هنرمنداني عمدا، اثري را ناكامل ارائه كردهاند يا برحسب اتفاق و ناخواسته، اين آثار شكل گرفته است؟ آيا يك اثر هنري را ميتوان تمام شده محسوب كرد؟ به عنوان يافته هاي اين پژوهش، مي توان چنين اظهار نمود كه با گذشت زمان و سپري شدن قرون متمادي و با توجه به گونه گونگي فرهنگ ها در جوامع بشري و تغيير و تحولات تكنيكي، اين موضوع دستخوش تغييراتي مي گردد كه در بسياري از قرون گذشته مطرح نبوده است و متعاقبا، در اين گونه آثار نگرش و رويكرد قابل توجهي ديده ميشود كه جاي واكاوي و تعمق دارد. سرانجام به عنوان نتيجه حاصل شده، بايد گفت كه اين گونه آثار در ابتدا از فضايي به پايان نرسيده سرچشمه گرفته، ليكن، بعدها به نگاهي پارادوكسال تبديل شده است و چه بسا از دست آوردهاي «ناتماميت» بهره جسته كه برداشتي نوآورانه و بسيار عميق فكري مي باشد. در واقع، استفاده از ناتماميت يا به ديگر سخن، پايان نيافته، هميشه نشات گرفته از فضايي حقيقتا، ناكامل نبوده است، بلكه گاه، برخي از هنرمندان براي به صحنه كشيدن ناديدني ها و يا به نمايش گذاشتن فضايي نامحسوس از قالب ناتماميت سود جسته اند.
چكيده لاتين :
The article at hand intends to examine the visual structure of works categorized
as ‘incomplete’ created by different artists in different epochs of
time or in other words, in the course of centuries which greatly affected the
viewpoints of many Western intellectuals. For this purpose, this study has
endeavored to answer two main questions: can an artworks be considered
complete, despite appearing to be unfinished? and also Have the artists deliberately
made an incomplete work or it has happened accidentally without
intention?
In any case, as the findings of this study, it can be stated that with the passage
of time and many centuries on the one hand, and due to the diversity of cultures
in human societies and technical changes from the other, the subject
has undergone tremendous changes that were absent during the past centuries
and subsequently, there is a significant attitude and approach in these
artworks that can be deliberated upon and interpreted.
The research findings indicate that such works were first rooted in an unfinished
space but later, they tuned into a paradoxical viewpoint and perhaps
utilized the achievements of ‘incompleteness’, which is ‘supposedly’ a very
profound, innovative notion. In fact, the use of ‘incompleteness’ or, in other
words, unfinished, has not always been rooted in an actually incomplete
space but sometimes, some artists have utilize ‘incompleteness’ to portray
things that cannot be seen or illustrate an intangible space.
So, some old works of visual arts, especially painting and sculpture, have
remained incomplete. Sometimes because completing them was time consuming
and other times, due to countless other reasons.
This is interesting for a group of artists that like ‘incomplete’ or ‘unfinished’
art.
Therefore, in order to clarify the reason for creating such works first the term unfinished and incomplete have been surveyed
from Etymological perspective. Then, brief history of incomplete visual artworks has been offered. In this connection, a particular
attention has been paid to the completion of such paintings and their statues. Afterwards, the visual structures of the
works which have become famous as unfinished works are studied. The research finally comes to conclusion.
Carried out through desk study of library resources and valid internet resources, the research has been conducted using historical-
descriptive method. Also the study takes up an analytical approach to clarify the relations. Particularly this research
has tried to take note of different cultures and religions as well as social, national and traditional outlooks that have emerged.