ﺗﺒﯿﯿﻦ ﻋﻨﺎﺻﺮ ﻣﺤﺘﻮاﯾﯽ اﻟﮕﻮي ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب در ﺑﺨﺶ دوﻟﺘﯽ

Explaining the Content Elements of a Good Governance-Based Performance Management Model in Public Agencies

ﺗﺤﻤﯿﻞ ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﭘﺎراداﯾﻢ ﺟﺪﯾﺪ در اداره ﺑﺨﺶ ﻋﻤـﻮﻣﯽ، ﺿـﺮورت وﺟـﻮد ﯾـﮏ ﻧﻈـﺎم ارزﯾﺎﺑﯽ و ﭘﺎﯾﺶ در ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد در ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﻫﺎي دوﻟﺘﯽ را ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﻧﻪ اي ﮐﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻮري از ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب ﺑﺎﺷﺪ، ﻧﻤﺎﯾﺎن ﻣﯽ ﺳﺎزد. اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﺎ اﺗﮑﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧـﻮب " ﻣﻄـﺮح ﻣـ ﯽ ﮐﻨـﺪ درﺻﺪد ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ و رﺗﺒﻪ ﺑﻨﺪي ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎ و ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎي ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧـﯽ ﺧـﻮب اﺳﺖ. روﯾﮑﺮد ﻣﺪﻧﻈﺮ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، روش ﺗﺮﮐﯿﺒﯽ و از ﻧﻮع اﮐﺘﺸﺎﻓﯽ اﺳﺖ. در ﺑﺨﺶ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ اﯾﻦ ﭘـﮋوﻫﺶ از روش دﻟﻔﯽ و در ﺑﺨﺶ ﮐﻤﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺗﺄﯾﯿﺪ ﻣﺪل از روش ﻣﻌﺎدﻻت ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎري اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. در ﺑﺨﺶ ﮐﯿﻔﯽ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﻪ آﻣﺎري اﯾﻦ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ10 ﻧﻔﺮ از ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎن داﻧﺸﮕﺎﻫﯽ و ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﺎن دﯾﻮان ﻣﺤﺎﺳـﺒﺎت ﮐﺸـﻮر و در ﺑﺨـﺶ ﮐﻤﯽ140 ﻧﻔﺮ از ﺣﺴﺎﺑﺮﺳﺎن دﯾﻮان ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎت ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻓﺮﻣﻮل ﮐﻮﮐﺮان اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﮔﺮدﯾﺪﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘـﺎﯾﺞ ﺗﺤﻠﯿـﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ اﮐﺘﺸﺎﻓﯽ ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﺳﻄﺢ ﻧﻬﺎدﯾﻨﮕﯽ ارزش ﻫﺎ ﺑﺎ ﺷﺶ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ و 41 ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﺑـﺎ ﻋﻨـﺎوﯾﻦ ﺛﺒـﺎت رﻫﺒﺮي و ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺘﯽ، ﺣﺴﺎب دﻫﯽ و ﭘﺎﺳﺨﮕﻮﯾﯽ، اﺛﺮﺑﺨﺸﯽ، ﺗﻨﻘﯿﺢ ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ، ﺣﺎﮐﻤﯿـﺖ ﻗـﺎﻧﻮن و ﻓﺴـﺎدﮔﺮﯾﺰي ﮔﺮدﯾﺪ. ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎي ﺣﺎﮐﻤﯿﺖ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن و ﻓﺴﺎدﮔﺮﯾﺰي ﺑﺎ ﺿﺮاﯾﺐ 0/698 و 0/661 ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﺗﯿﺐ رﺗﺒﻪ اول و دوم ﻗـﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺖ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺑﺎرﻫﺎي ﻋﺎﻣﻠﯽ ﺑﺰرگ ﺗﺮ از5 /.درﺻﺪ ﺑﻪ دﺳـﺖ آﻣـﺪه در ﺣﺎﻟـﺖ اﺳـﺘﺎﻧﺪارد و ﻫﻤﭽﻨـﯿﻦ ﻣﻌﯿـﺎر0/69=GOF ﻧﺸﺎن از ﺗﺄﯾﯿﺪ رواﺑﻂ ﺑﯿﻦ ﻣﺆﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎ و ﺷﺎﺧﺺ ﻫﺎ اﺳﺖ. ﺑﻨﺎﺑﺮاﯾﻦ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ اﯾﻦ ﺳﻄﺢ از ﻣـﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﻣﻨﺠﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺮﮐﺖ ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﻫﺎي دوﻟﺘﯽ در ﻣﺴﯿﺮ ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب و ﺑﻬﺒﻮد ﻣﺆﻟﻔـﻪ ﻫـﺎ و ﺷـﺎﺧﺺ ﻫـﺎ ي ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ.

Imposing Good Governance as a New Paradigm in Public Sector demonstrates the need for an evaluation and monitoring system in the form of performance management in government agencies to be a reflection of good governance. It proposes to identify and rank the components and indicators of performance management based on the concept of good governance. The approach used in this research is a hybrid and exploratory method. The structural equation method has been used Hey and the auditors are the country's accounting court. The findings of exploratory factor analysis resulted in the identification of six components and 41 indicators, namely leadership, and managerial stability, accountability and accountability, effectiveness,discipline the rules, rule of law and corruption.