علم پيشين مغايرِ متصل با ذات از ديدگاه صدرالمتالهين شيرازي

Divine knowledge of being connected with nature from the viewpoint of Sadr al-Din Shirazes

برخي از محققين معاصر به واسطه بعضي عبارات صدرالمتالهين بر اين باورند كه ملاصدرا علاوه بر علم پيشين ذاتي و علم مع الفعل ،به علم پيشين مغايرِ متصل با ذات نيز اعتقاد دارد.در اين پژوهش پس از بررسي مستندات، مي توان به اين نتايج دست يافت كه هر چند برخي مستندات اين رأي قابل مناقشه است اما صدرالدين منكر علم پيشين مغايرِ متصل با ذات براي خداوند نيست و سخن از صور علميه اي مي نمايد كه لازم ذاتِ واجب بوده و نيازي به جعل ، تأثير و تأثر نداشته و از اجزاي عالم محسوب نمي شوند كه اين نحوه از علم را لازمه ي علم پيشين ذاتي و از لوازم قاعده بسيط الحقيقة مي داند و مقصود وي از اين صور، صور مرتسمه مشاء نيست بلكه همان اعيان ثابته عرفاست كه از شئون ذاتي حق بوده و مورد جعل قرار نگرفته و به وجود حق موجودند نه به ايجاد او ،كه اين مرتبه را قضاء رباني مي نامد كه باقي به بقاء واجب تعالي است.

Some contemporary scholars in some of the allegations of Sadr al-Mota'alahin believe that MullahSadra believes in the invisible divine knowledge of being connected with nature, in addition to his inward knowledge and active knowledge In this research, after reviewing the documentation, one can conclude that, although some of the documents of this ruling are controversial, but Sadr al-Din doesn't denies the previous contradictory knowledge of being connected to nature for God. an‎d it speaks of a theological form in which the essential of nature is obligatory and does not require any forgery and influence, and they are not considered components of the universe. Which considers this mode of knowledge necessary for the prior knowledge inherent in and based on the simple reality.
an‎d the purpose of this form is not the intelligible form, but the same as the true laws of the mystics, which are inherent in the truth and are not forged, and that there is a right to exist, not to create him, this is called the sacramental case, which remains for the survival of excellence