چكيده لاتين :
Introduction
Iran rural contemporary history has shown that the rural community has been faced with rapid changes. The consequences of these rapid changes have been emerging new forms of social control over the rural community. In rural social control, rural management problem arises. In fact, rural management is the process of organizing, directing rural community and environment through the formation of organizations and institutions, and moreover, for Taleb (2014), rural management is the science of "combining and adjusting various natural, human and economic factors in the rural community.
Totally, Iran by having more than 65,000 villages close to 85 percent of the country's biological and natural resources and reservoirs, is among the countries that in order to achieve rural development and then urban development and national development require a systematic and robust management system in villages. For this reason, from the past various management systems have been implemented in the range of the country villages. Also, rural management system in Iran in the past years has been changed in terms of social structures and the lack of efficient and correct management in villages in all periods - especially since 40s- and even recent decades, caused many problems for the villagers. Although after the victory of Iran Islamic Revolution organizations such as village Islamic Councils, Assistance House, rural development office and like them were formed in villages, but due to the lack of necessary fields and related executive organizations much success has not been achieved. Considering the importance of the social capacity building to improve the management of rural development. Iran should rely on the knowledge-based management, rural development and for the realization of the knowledge based platforms provide in villages.
Methodology
The main objective of this study is to analyze the effects of social capacity building on management of rural development is a warm city. The method based on the purpose and use of the cross-sectional nature of the study population, including the rural people over age 15 living in rural areas, is warmly city (N= 37653), Of which 400 were selected as sample using Cochran formula. Validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by a panel of experts. Pilot study in the same region with a total of 30 questionnaires were population and business data and using a special formula Cronbach's alpha software SPSS, reliability of the questionnaire research questionnaire 0/73 to 0/82, respectively.
Next, raw data were collected for measuring indexes through interviews, observation, questionnaires, and documents. Also through the questionnaire tool, social capacity making component was measured using 75 closed questions and Five-Point Likert Spectrum was used for scoring. In the scoring step, since a handful of questions were raised in the negative direction, re-coding was done for these categories of questions by via SPSS software. Therefore, scoring to the answers of these questions with the positive direction is as follows: 5= I strongly agree, 4= agree, 3= neutral, 2= disagree, and 1= strongly disagree, and in the case of negative questions, this scoring is a vice versa.
Results and Discussion
The analytical results showed that the relationship between education and extension, self-esteem, quality of life, social cohesion, social services, technical and management skills, strengthen social interactions and strengthen grassroots organizations to improve the management of rural development and significant correlation there is finally according to findings, and practical suggestions are provided.
Also, based on of Beta results, share and role of variables “social interactions” on explanation of independent variable “rural development management improvement” is more than another variables. In addition, spatial distribution studied villages from perspective social capacity-building in the weak level (1 until 2.33), medium level (2.34 until 3.66) and high level (3.67 until 5) showed that the villages of Majidlou (3.59), own birbiglo (3.58), takanlo (3.51), Nasrollah Biglou (3.43), Tosanlou (3.4), Ghasem Kandi (3.39), Bonhe (3.26), Kelansora (3.26), Gilaro (3.26), Dizj (3.24), Och Aghaj (3.24), Pormehr (3.24), Toloun (3.17), Arzanag (3.16), Afsoran (3.14), Zahra (3.10), Mohreh (3.09), Ghaleh Barzand (3.08), Shamarbiglou (3.08), from perspective social capacity building has priority first until nineteen and form viewpoint has in the level of medium.
Conclusion
With regarding of research findings and effects of social capacity building on improvement of rural development management is obvious that attainment to development such as achievement to rural development at short time is not possible. Another, in the case of achievement of high social -economical welfare is necessary that for attaining to this aim is used from all resources and natural and human equipments such as desirable and calculated. Occurrence of this problem has a various root such as that return to planning macro level that centralized planning systems in Iran is cause of that. This system is creator of directive programmers that is attended to rural and residing people of rural. In total, with attention of to rural development management on accomplish rural development is necessary that with making priority of rural people is resulted to fundamental and scientific accomplish of rural development program. In total, the results of research showed that is positive relationship between social capacity building and improvement of environmental, social, economical and institutional.
Finally, according to the results of the study it is suggested a systematic attitude to improve rural management is considered in the instruction of managers and those responsible for rural development management because the systematic approach helps in understanding complex aspects of the management and in this regard the ground of creating a desirable change is provided and villagers as the main beneficiaries of rural management are considered the main bodies of the system that through their participation in the overall process of rural management providing needed platform for prosperity and sustainable development of rural areas can be expected. Moreover, it is suggested to consider organizing, structural and institutional recreating and the country rural management by establishing the country rural organizations at the level of managerial macro structure and establishing an independent and autonomous unit of rural development management at the micro level in the country villages with clear and essential duties the most important strategy for managing the country rural development.
