كليدواژه :
مناطق شهري , توسعه يافتگي , مدل تاكسونومي عددي , موريس , تاپسيس , كلانشهر اصفهان
چكيده فارسي :
برنامه‌ريزي شهري با هدف توسعه و كاهش نابرابري از موضوع‌هاي مهم در كشورهاي در حال توسعه محسوب مي‌شود. لازمه برنامه ريزي شهري، شناسايي جايگاه مناطق و نواحي نسبت به يكديگر از لحاظ توسعه است .كاهش نابرابري در بهره‌مندي از منابع، دست‌آوردها و امكانات جامعه يكي از مهمترين معيارهاي توسعه به شمار مي‌آيد. مفهوم توسعه علاوه بر رشد در همه جهات، توزيع متعادل را نيز در بر مي‌گيرد، توزيع متعادل امكانات و خدمات، گامي در جهت از بين بردن تفاوت‌هاي ناحيه‌اي و پراكندگي متناسب جمعيت در سطح شهر است .توسعه متوازن فضاهاي جغرافيايي، نيازمند بررسي دقيق و همه جانبه مسايل اقتصادي، اجتماعي، فرهنگي و شناخت نيازهاي جامعه و بهبود آن‌هاست. به‌همين جهت از جمله معيارهاي معمول در برنامه‌ريزي شهري، سطح‌بندي مناطق و نواحي بر اساس برخورداري از شاخص‌هاي مختلف توسعه است. در پژوهش حاضر سعي شده با بهره‌گيري از سه تكنيك تاكسونومي عددي ، موريس و تاپسيس و استفاده از 63 شاخص توسعه در زمينه هاي محيطي- اكولوژيك، اجتماعي- فرهنگي ،اقتصادي و كالبدي- فضايي به تعيين و تحليل سطوح توسعه مناطق شهري اصفهان پرداخته شود.
رويكرد حاكم بر اين پژوهش توصيفي، تحليلي و از نوع كاربردي- توسعه‌اي است. يافته‌هاي پژوهش نشان مي‌دهد كه منطقه‌ي سه براساس دو مدل تاپسيس و تاكسونومي در رتبه‌ي نخست و طبق مدل موريس در رتبه‌ي دوم توسعه يافتگي قرار مي‌گيرد و منطقه‌ي يازده براساس نتايج هر سه مدل به عنوان محروم ترين منطقه محسوب مي گردد.
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction
One of the main goals in urban planning is the equitable allocation for facilities, services and reducing inequalities. This requires to identify the status of development in urban areas according to each other. Better understanding and recognizing the amount of the enjoyment levels of regions and comparing them to each other causes their weakness, strength, opportunities and future threats to be recognized, and finally cause the regional and zonal planning to be succeeded.
The use of quantitative criteria and procedures for ranking settlements in space system also led to identification of measure the inequality settlement and on the other hand this is a measure to try to reduce and eliminate disparities between them. Therefore, this study aims to analyze a set of development indicators, in Isfahan urban regions to ranking development of the urban regions of Isfahan and in this way the problems of each region will identify and by prioritize the regions for the allocation and distribution of resources and amenities based on surveyed criterions created a balanced development of its regions.
Methodology
One of the common criteria in urban planning is the classification of the regions and districts based on different development indicators. In the present study, by using three techniques including numerical Taxonomy, Morris and TOPSIS and using 63 development indices in environmental - ecological, social -cultural, economic and physical-spatial areas, urban development levels have been analyzed in district of Isfahan.
Result and Discussion
The results of the study show that district Three is in the first rank based on TOPSIS and Taxonomy models and in the second place according to the Morris model, and district eleven considered the most deprived area based on the results of all three models.
In terms of economic indicators, the rank of district three is first in all three models, and district fifteen by three models, Morris, Taxonomy, and TOPSIS is in the last place. In terms of cultural indicators, five district was ranked first in two taxonomy models and Morris, and district eleven is the most deprived.
In terms of physical indicators, district Three was ranked first in all three models and fourteen district was ranked the last. According to the TOPSIS model, eleventh district was the most deprived area. In terms of environmental-ecological indicators, district eleven is the most deprived area and based on both the Morris and TOPSIS models, the four district is the most developed area.
Conclusion
As it is shown in the maps provided, the deprived areas are located on the western and eastern margins of the city and it can be considered as a danger, because in the absence of proper consideration and reduction of inequality these areas will be on the verge of crises such as social, cultural and economic damage, and eventually we will see phenomena, such as informal housing, flooding and other social disasters in these areas, in this stage of Problems, organize and repair structures will be much more difficult, so the need of early consideration for these areas is well understood.
