ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ در ﺑﯿﻦ ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﻓﻌﺎل و ﻏﯿﺮﻓﻌﺎل

Comparison of Quality of Life between Active and Inactive Workers

ﻣﻘﺪﻣﻪ: ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ ﻣﻬﻢ و ﻣﺘﻌﺪدي ﻧﻈﯿﺮ وﺿﻌﯿﺖ ﺟﺴﻤﯽ و رواﻧﯽ ﺑﺮ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮﮔﺬار اﺳﺖ. از ﺳﻮﯾﯽ اﺳﺘﺮس ﺷﻐﻠﯽ ﻧﯿﺰ ﯾﮑﯽ از ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ اﺳﺎﺳﯽ در ﮐﺎﻫﺶ ﺑﻬﺮهوري در ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﻫﺎ اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺎﺛﯿﺮات ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﯽ ﺑﺮ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ، اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ در ﺑﯿﻦ ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﻓﻌﺎل و ﻏﯿﺮﻓﻌﺎل )ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻣﻮردي( اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪ. روش ﺑﺮرﺳﯽ: اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ از ﻧﻮع ﻣﻘﻄﻌﯽ– ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ اي ﺑﻮد.190 ﻧﻔﺮ از ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﭘﺴﺖ ﻫﺎي ﺗﻮﻟﯿﺪي ﮐﺎرﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﻫﺎي ﮐﺎﺷﯽ و ﺳﯿﻤﺎن ﮐﻪ ﺷﺮاﯾﻂ ﺣﻀﻮر در ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ را داﺷﺘﻨﺪ ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮي در دﺳﺘﺮس و ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮرت ﮐﺎﻣﻼً داوﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪ در ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. از اﯾﻦ ﺗﻌﺪاد، ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﮏ )Beck(، ﺗﻌﺪاد 88 ﻧﻔﺮ در ﮔﺮوه ﻏﯿﺮﻓﻌﺎل و 64 ﻧﻔﺮ در ﮔﺮوه ﻓﻌﺎل ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻨﺪ و از ﭘﺮﺳﺶ ﻧﺎﻣﻪ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ )36- SF( وﯾﺮ و ﺷﺮﺑﻮرن اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. از آزﻣﻮنT ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻞ ﺑﺮاي ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﺑﯿﻦ ﮔﺮوه ﻫﺎ و از ﻧﺮم اﻓﺰار 16 SPSS version ﺑﺮاي ﺗﺠﺰﯾﻪ و ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﻧﺸﺎن داد، ﻣﻮﻟﻔﻪ ﻫﺎي ﺟﺴﻤﺎﻧﯽ، رواﻧﯽ و ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ در ﮔﺮوه ﻓﻌﺎل ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﮐﺎرﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﯿﻤﺎن )0/012 =p( )p=0/005) (p=0/000( و ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﮐﺎﺷﯽ )p= 0/014) (p=0/005) (p=0/012( در ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ ﺑﺎ ﮔﺮوه ﻏﯿﺮﻓﻌﺎل ﻣﻌﻨﯽدار و ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ اﺳﺖ وﻟﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ﻓﻌﺎل و ﻏﯿﺮﻓﻌﺎل دو ﮐﺎرﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﮐﺎﺷﯽ و ﺳﯿﻤﺎن ﺗﻔﺎوت ﻣﻌﻨﯽ داري وﺟﻮد ﻧﺪارد. ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﮔﯿﺮي: ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ اﯾﻦ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﺑﯿﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻣﺜﺒﺖ ورزش و ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﯽ ﺑﺮ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ اﻓﺮاد ﺷﺎﻏﻞ در ﮐﺎرﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺳﯿﻤﺎن و ﮐﺎﺷﯽ ﺑﻮد. ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮر ﺳﺎده ﺗﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻣﯽ رﺳﺪ ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺖ ﺑﺪﻧﯽ و ورزش ﺑﺎ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ زﻧﺪﮔﯽ ﮐﺎرﮔﺮان ارﺗﺒﺎط داﺷﺘﻪ و رﺑﻄﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﮑﺎن ﮐﺎرندارد

Introduction: Numerous important factors such as physical and mental condition affect the quality of life Job stress is one of the key factors in decreasing productivity in organizations. Given the positive effects of physical activity on quality of life, this study aimed to compare the quality of life between active and inactive workers (case study). Methods: This study was a cross-sectional comparative study.190 tile and cement-manufacturing workers who were eligible for the study were selected completely voluntarily, based on a convenience sampling. Of these, according to Beck questionnaire, 88 were selected in inactive and 64 in active groups; Weir and Sherborn questionnaire was used for assessing the quality of life (SF-36). For analysis the data, independent T-test and SPSS 16 software were used for analysis (P≤0.05). Results: The results showed that physical, psychological and quality of life components in the active group of cement factory workers were (p = 0.012) (p = 0.001) (p = 0.005) and tile workers (p = 0.012) (P = 0.005) (p = 0.014) was a significant and more compare to the inactive group, but there was no significant difference between active and inactive workers of the two tile and cement factories. Conclusion: The results of this study showed the positive role of exercise and physical activity on the quality of life of people working in cement and tile factories. It seems easier physical activity and sports are related to the quality of life of workers and have nothing to do with the workplace.