چكيده لاتين :
The purpose of this study was to investigate the the impact narcissism on teachers' organizational silencerelationship between manager’s narcissism and The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and teachers' organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, & Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and teachers' organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and teachers' organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with teachers' organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was positive and significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on teachers' organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on teachers' organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and teachers' organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the teachers' organizational silence.
Torganizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, & Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, & Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, & Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09). Thus can conclude that manager’s narcissism either directly or indirectly, through the mediating variable of organizational hypocrisy has a positive and significant relationship with the organizational silence of employees.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between manager’s narcissism and organizational silence with mediating role of organizational hypocrisy. This study is an applied and correlation research method based on structural equation modeling. 255 teachers of Zahedan city were studied by stratified random sampling method. To collect information, three questionnaires were used: Narcissism (Ghoreyshi Rad, 2015), organizational hypocrisy (Adapted from Hadavinejad, Danaeifard, Azar, & Khaefelahi, 2010) and organizational silence (Van Dyne, Ang, & Botero, 2003). For data analysis the Pearson correlation coefficient and structural equation modeling were used by SPSS and Lisrel software. Based on results the the amount of correlation coefficient of manager’s narcissism and organizational hypocrisy (r=0.407, p < 0.001), manager’s narcissism and organizational silence (r=0.398, p < 0.001), organizational hypocrisy with organizational silence (r=0.331, p < 0.01) was significant. The direct effect of manager’s narcissis on organizational silence (β=0.36, t=4.54), the direct effect of manager’s narcissism on organizational hypocrisy (β=0.45, t=6.59) and the direct effect organizational hypocrisy on organizational silence (β=0.2, t=2.54) was significant. The indirect effect of manager’s narcissism and organizational silence was also significant with the mediator role of organizational hypocrisy (β=0.09)
