پديد آورندگان :
موسوي، فروغ سادات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد علوم و تحقيقات، تهران، ايران - دانشكدهٔ علوم انساني و اجتماعي , اسكندري، حسين دانشگاه علامه طباطبائي، تهران، ايران , باقري، فريبرز دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد علوم و تحقيقات، تهران، ايران
كليدواژه :
خانواده , خيانت زناشويي , واقعيت درماني , درمان هيجان مدار , كيفيت زناشويي , رضايت زناشويي
چكيده فارسي :
زمينه و هدف: يكي از خطرات زندگي خانوادگي، خيانت زناشويي است كه مشكلات بسياري براي شخص خيانت‌ديده در پي دارد؛ بنابراين هدف پژوهش حاضر مقايسهٔ اثربخشي دو روش درماني، واقعيت‌درماني و درمان هيجان‌مدار بر كيفيت و رضايت زناشويي زنان خيانت‌ديدهٔ تهران بود.
روش بررسي: روش مطالعهٔ حاضر از نوع شبه‌آزمايشي با دو گروه آزمايش و يك‌گروه گواه بود. جامعهٔ آماري را تمامي زنان متأهل خيانت‌ديده تشكيل دادند كه به مراكز مشاورهٔ سازمان بهزيستي شهر تهران در سال 1397 مراجعه كردند. نمونه‌ها 45 نفر از مراجعان بودند كه به‌شيوهٔ نمونه‌گيري خوشه‌اي چندمرحله‌اي انتخاب شدند و به‌صورت تصادفي در دو گروه آزمايش (واقعيت‌درماني گلاسر و درمان هيجان‌مدار) و يك‌گروه گواه (هر گروه 15 نفر) قرار گرفتند. در هر گروه آزمايش هشت جلسه مداخله اجرا شد. ابزارهاي پژوهش شامل پرسشنامهٔ كيفيت زناشويي (باسبي و همكاران، 1995) و رضايت زناشويي انريچ (السون و همكاران، 1982) و پروتكل واقعيت درماني (عباسي و همكاران، 1396) و پروتكل درمان هيجان مدار (بهرامي و همكاران، 1388) بود. براي تحليل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخهٔ 22 و از روش تحليل كوواريانس استفاده شد.
يافته‌ها: نتايج آماري نشان داد كه هر دو گروه آزمايش درمقايسه با گروه گواه در ميزان رضايت و كيفيت زناشويي تفاوت معناداري دارند (0٫001>p). همچنين نتايج آزمون تعقيبي LSD حاكي‌از آن بود كه بين اثربخشي درمان گلاسر و هيجان‌مداري بر ميزان كيفيت روابط زناشويي در مرحلهٔ پس‌آزمون تفاوت معناداري وجود ندارد (0٫374=p)؛ اما نمرهٔ رضايت زناشويي در روش درماني هيجان‌مدار بيشتر از روش درماني گلاسر براساس واقعيت‌درماني است (0٫001>p).
نتيجه‌گيري: درمان هيجان‌مدار با بهبود جراحات دل‌بستگي و تنظيم هيجانات و واقعيت‌درماني با تأكيد بر مسئوليت شخصي و شناخت نيازها، به بهبود آسيب خيانت كمك مي‌كند.
چكيده لاتين :
Background & Objectives: Family life is tied to numerous threats that could destroy it. One of these dangers is marital infidelity, which generates multiple problems and has diverse psychological effects on the affected individuals. One of the most significant impacts of marital infidelity is declined relationship quality and marital satisfaction; this condition could lead to the collapse of marital life and divorce if not intervened promptly. Therefore, it is required to design and select therapies to prevent the harmful effects of infidelity on families. Accordingly,
this study aimed to compare the effects of Glasser's Reality Therapy (RT) and Emotion–Focused Therapy (EFT) on betrayed women.
Methods: This was a quasi–experimental study with two experimental groups and one control group. The statistical population of the study
consisted of all betrayed married women who referred to the counseling centers of the Welfare Organization of Tehran City, Iran, in 2017. The
study sample included 45 individuals. In the first step, sampling was conducted by a multistage cluster sampling method. Then, the study subjects
were randomly selected from 5 districts (2, 7, 11, 16, 21) out of the 22 districts of Tehran. Then, 2 counseling centers were randomly selected
from each of the selected regions. Besides, 45 betrayed women were selected by random sampling method and were randomly assigned to either
one of the experimental groups 1 and 2, or the control group (n=15/group). Each experimental group received 8 sessions of Glasser's RT or EFT.
The research instruments included the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) (Busby et al., 1995), ENRICH Marriage Satisfaction
Questionnaire (Olson et al., 1982), RT protocol (Abbasi et al., 2017), and EFT protocol (Bahrami et al., 2009). All study groups, before and after
the end of the sessions and intervention, complemented the questionnaires. Finally, marital satisfaction and marital quality scores were compared.
The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: The ANCOVA results indicated a significant difference in the scores of marital satisfaction and quality of marital relationships in both
test groups, compared to the controls (p<0.001). The Eta squared value suggested that approximately 74% and 84% of the variance of the scores
of quality of marital relations and marital satisfaction were respectively explained by the difference between the two provided interventions. Due
to the significant difference between the posttest scores in the experimental and control groups, a two–way study of the significant difference
between the three posttest scores of marital relationship quality and marital satisfaction was performed through pairwise comparisons (mean
difference; primary–secondary) by Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) posthoc test. The LSD test data revealed no significant difference
between the effects of Glaser's RT and EFT on the quality of marital relationships in the posttest phase (p=0.374). However, there was a
significant difference between the efficacy of RT and EFT on marital satisfaction at the posttest (p<0.001).
Conclusion: EFT helps improve the damage of infidelity by alleviating attachment defects and regulating emotions. Moreover, RT provides such effects by emphasizing personal responsibility and recognizing the individual’s needs.
