پديد آورندگان :
حب وطن، محمد وزارت نيرو - دفتر نظام‌هاي بهره برداري و حفاظت منابع آب، تهران، ايران , حيدري، نادر سازمان تحقيقات، آموزش، و ترويج كشاورزي - موسسه تحقيقات فني و مهندسي كشاورزي - بخش تحقيقات آبياري و زهكشي، كرج، ايران , جعفري، بهيه وزارت نيرو - گروه برنامه‌ريزي دفتر برنامه‌ريزي كلان آب و آبفاف تهران، ايران , ارشدي، محمد وزارت نيرو، تهران، ايران , لطفي، سارا وزارت نيرو، تهران، ايران , ضرغامي، مهدي دانشگاه تبريز - دانشكده مهندسي عمران و پژوهشكده محيط زيست، تبريز، ايران
كليدواژه :
شوراي عالي آب , حكمراني آب , راهبرد مديريت آب , تحليل SWOT
چكيده فارسي :
شورايعالي آب با هدف ايجاد بسترهاي نهادي و سازماني لازم جهت هماهنگي سياست‌هاي تأمين، توزيع و مصرف آب در سال 1379 وفق ماده 10 قانون تشكيل وزارت جهاد كشاورزي ايجاد شده است. هدف از اين مقاله ارائه نتايج و دستاوردهاي حاصل از بررسي‌هاي انجام‌شده در زمينه شناسايي، بررسي و تحليل نقاط قوّت وضعف و فرصت‌ها و تهديدهاي فراروي شورا و در نهايت شناخت و ارائه راهبردها و راهكارهاي اجرايي براي ارتقاي اقتدار و اثربخشي بيشتر شورايعالي آب كشور مي‌باشد. روش‌شناسي بكار رفته در اين پژوهش بر مبناي تشكيل كارگروه كارشناسي و برگزاري جلسات براي دريافت ايده ها و نظرات و در نهايت استفاده تركيبي از فنSWOT)به مقادير امتيازهاي موزون محاسبه شده براي عوامل دروني و بيروني (به ترتيب برابر 2/342 و62/ 2) نقطه تلاقي اين دو مقدار در نمودار SWOT در منطقه WO قرار گرفته كه نشان داد راهبرد محوري انتخابي براي ارتقاي اقتدار شورايعالي آب، بايستي راهبرد محافظه‌كارانه باشد. براي اثربخشي و اقتدار بيشتر شورا همچنين چشم انداز و ماموريت جديدي براي شورايعالي آب تعريف و پيشنهاد گرديد. همچنين پنج راهبرد اصلي براي بهبود عملكرد شورايعالي آب و نيز 21 برنامه اقدام براي بهبود عملكرد و اقتدار شورايعالي آب شناسايي و اولويت بندي شدند.ﺪ. اﻗﺪاﻣﺎت ﭘﯿﺸﻨﻬﺎدي ﺑﻪ ﺗﻨﺎﺳﺐ ذﯾﻞ راﻫﺒﺮدﻫﺎي اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ﺷﺪه ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ و ﺳﭙﺲ وزندﻫﯽ و اوﻟﻮﯾﺖﺑﻨﺪي ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪ ﺣﺎﺻﻠﻪ ﻧﺸﺎن داد ﮐﻪ در ﺣﮑﻤﺮاﻧﯽ ﺧﻮب آب و ﺑﺮاي ﺳﯿﺎﺳﺖﮔﺬاري ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ روﺣﯿﻪ ﻫﻤﮑﺎري ﺑﯿﻦ ﻧﻬﺎدي ﻓﯿﻤﺎﺑﯿﻦ ﻧﻬﺎدﻫﺎي دوﻟﺘﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﯾﮏ اﺻﻞ اﺳﺎﺳﯽ ﻣﻮرد ﭘﺬﯾﺮش ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ و ﺗﻌﺎﻣﻼت اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺷﻮرا ﻧﯿﺰ اﻓﺰاﯾﺶ ﯾﺎﺑﺪ. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﻫﻤﮑﺎريﻫﺎي ﺷﻮرا ﺑﺎ ﺳﺎﯾﺮ وزارﺗﺨﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎي درون ﻗﻮه ﻣﺠﺮﯾﻪ، ﻗﻮه ﻗﻀﺎﺋﯿﻪ، ﻗﻮه ﻣﻘﻨﻨﻪ، داﻧﺸﮕﺎهﻫﺎ، ﺳﺎزﻣﺎنﻫﺎي ﻣﺮدم ﻧﻬﺎد و ﺳﺎﯾﺮ ﻧﻬﺎدﻫﺎي ذﯾﻤﺪﺧﻞ ﺿﺮوري ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﺑﻮد
چكيده لاتين :
The Iran’s Supreme Water Council (SWC) was established in 2000 with the aim of creating the necessary institutional and organizational bases for the coordination of policies on water supply, distribution and consumption. However, two decades after its inception, the fact that the water management issues are becoming more complex and deeper and the discrepancies in the policies, actions, and their consequences are widening, raise the questions that; to what extent has the SWC been successful in its missions, and to what extent has it had the necessary effectiveness and authority in resolving the conflicts and applying good water governance in the country. Accordingly, the objective of this paper is to present the results and achievements in identifying, reviewing and analyzing the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing the SWC and to conclude the strategies and action plan needed to improve the performance of the SWC. The methodology used is based on the formation of an expert working group from different disciplines and sectors and holding brain storming meetings to harvest ideas of stakeholders. Finally the study employed a combination of SWOT technology and matrix technique (IFE-EFE Matrix) to evaluate internal and external factors for analyzing the results. The study identified 11 strengths (S), 10 weaknesses (W), 9 opportunities (O) and 7 threats (T) in regards of the SWC. According to the calculated scores for internal and external factors (i.e. 2.34 and 2.62, respectively), the intersection of these two values in the SWOT diagram located in the “WO” zone, which indicated that the main strategy to be followed to improve the authority of the SWC, would be an adaptive (conservative) strategy. For greater effectiveness and authority of the SWC, a new vision and mission was developed. Also, five sub-main strategies and 21 actions were identified to improve the performance and authority of the SWC. The proposed action plan was tailored to the identified sub-strategies, and then weighted and prioritized. The results indicated that in good water governance and for coordinated policy-making, the spirit of inter-institutional cooperation between government institutions should be accepted as a fundamental principle and the social interactions of the council should be increased. It is also necessary to expand the council's cooperation with ministries within the executive branch, the judiciary branch, the legislative branch, universities, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders.
