بررسي تأثير سبك‌هاي رهبري فرماندهان بر اثربخشي فعاليت پايگاه‌هاي مقاومت (مورد مطالعه: يكي از شهرستان هاي استان اصفهان)

Investigating the effect of commanders' leadership styles on the effectiveness of resistance bases (Case study: one of the cities of Isfahan province)

هدف تحقيق حاضر بررسي تأثير سبك‌هاي رهبري فرماندهان بر اثربخشي فعاليت پايگاه‌هاي مقاومت شهرستان برخوار مي‌باشد. روش تحقيق از نوع «توصيفي پيمايشي» و به روش ميداني انجام‌شده است. جامعه آماري اين پژوهش، بسيجيان مرتبط با پايگاه‌هاي مقاومت شهرستان برخوار مي‌باشند كه شامل فرماندهان و مديران پايگاه و فرماندهان و مديران حوزه‌هاي مقاومت و ساير بسيجيان شامل 2369 نفر مي‌باشد. نمونه‌گيري به روش خوشه‌اي و از هر پايگاه 10 نفر در نظر گرفته‌شده و درمجموع 494 نمونه جهت انجام پژوهش مورد تجزيه‌وتحليل قرارگرفته است. ابزار اندازه‌گيري تحقيق پرسشنامه استاندارد سبك رهبري و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته اثربخشي پايگاه‌هاي مقاومت مي‌باشد. روايي پرسشنامه‌ها از طريق اساتيد دانشگاه و متخصصين تائيد شده و پايايي پرسش‌نامه‌ اثربخشي نيز از طريق آلفاي كرونباخ با مقدار 95/0 مورد تائيد قرار گرفت. تجزيه‌وتحليل داده‌ها به‌وسيله نرم‌افزار SPSS، آزمون‌هاي كولموگروف اسميرنف، ضريب همبستگي اسپيرمن و تحليل رگرسيون صورت گرفته است. در بين سبك‌هاي بررسي‌شده، تأثير سبك‌هاي رهبري دلسوزانه و مشاوره‌اي و مشاركتي بر اثربخشي معنادار و مثبت و سبك آمرانه معنادار و منفي مي‌باشند. در نتايج به‌دست‌آمده از اين تحقيق مشخص شد بالاترين ميزان اثربخشي در بين پايگاه‌ها مربوط به پايگاه‌هايي است كه از سبك رهبري مشاركتي استفاده نمايند.

Abstract The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of commanders' leadership styles on the effectiveness of the activities of the city's resistance bases. The research method is descriptive-survey and has been done by field method. The statistical population of this study is the Basijis related to the resistance bases of the city, which includes the commanders and managers of the bases and the commanders and managers of the resistance areas and other Basijis including 2369 people. Cluster sampling was considered and 10 people from each base were considered and a total of 494 samples were analyzed for research. The research measurement tools are the standard leadership style questionnaire and the researcher-made questionnaire on the effectiveness of resistance bases. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by university professors and experts and the reliability of the effectiveness questionnaire was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha with a value of 0.95. Data were analyzed by SPSS software, Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Spearman correlation coefficient and regression analysis. Among the studied styles, the effect of compassionate, counseling and participatory leadership styles on significant and positive effectiveness and authoritarian style are significant and negative. The results of this study showed that the highest effectiveness among the bases is related to the bases that use the participatory leadership style. Highlights Although much research has been done on the issue of leadership style and its relationship to effectiveness in other organizations, addressing this issue has received less attention in resistance bases. Also, the view of effectiveness in other organizations is different from the view presented in this study about the effectiveness of databases. For example, in most researches, one of the effectiveness models such as Parsons model is used as the basis of the questionnaire and the effectiveness is measured by this criterion, while in this research, the effectiveness measurement tool and tool is designed and implemented based on another index and criterion. With the explanation that according to the statement of the second step, a ten-year roadmap for mobilization has been compiled and approved by the Supreme Leader of the Revolution. It is defined as the waiting document, so the effectiveness of the databases is actually the achievement of the goals mentioned in the waiting document.