عنوان به زبان ديگر :
The effects of residential communities’ physical boundaries on residents’ perception of fear of crime: comparison between gated, perceived gated, and non-gated communities in Ekbatan neighborhood, Tehran
پديد آورندگان :
جليلي، محمد دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد بروجرد - گروه معماري، بروجرد، ايران , عيني فر، عليرضا دانشگاه تهران - دانشكده معماري - پرديس هنرهاي زيبا، تهران، ايران , مدني، رامين دانشگاه هنر اصفهان - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه معماري، اصفهان، ايران , جاد، بروس دانشگاه نيوساوت ولز - دانشكده هنر، طراحي و معماري، سيدني، استراليا
كليدواژه :
مجموعه مسكوني , محدوده كالبدي , مستحكم سازي , ترس از جرم , شهرك اكباتان
چكيده لاتين :
BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effects of the physical boundaries of residential communities on residents’ perception of fear of crime. The physical boundary of a community is the dividing line that officially delineates the limits of the land or premises of that community and separates it from the surrounding urban fabric. In the housing literature, communities around which a physical boundary is created through gates and fences/walls are called gated communities. Gated communities include both new developments and older areas retrofitted for reasons of security and are found in both urban and suburban areas. In the literature, there is no consensus on the quality of perceived security in gated communities. Despite the claim that gated communities provide their residents with higher levels of security, some studies have indicated no significant difference between the residents of gated communities and the residents of non-gated communities in terms of perceived fear of crime. The disagreements might have resulted from the different research methods used in previous studies. How gated communities are studied is important. Apparently, three general methodological approaches have been employed in previous studies to study the effects of gated communities. First, in the easiest and least rigorous research design, one or two variables have been investigated in a case study on gated communities. Second, in slightly more rigorous research designs, gated communities have been compared with non-gated communities, but possible moderating factors have not been considered. Third, more sophisticated research designs have compared gated communities with non-gated communities and considered at least some possible moderators, usually demographic variables, in a more sophisticated correlational research design. We employed a research design that compared numerous gated communities with numerous non-gated communities and involved investigator control over key variables. Meeting the requirements of a truly experimental research design is highly improbable in housing studies as meeting the conditions under which the researcher is able to manipulate the independent variables and eliminate or control moderating variables is almost impossible. Even if this were possible, the conditions of an experiment are so artificial and unreal that it is impossible to generalise the results to other contexts. However, through a causal comparative research design which is a type of correlational research that stakes out an intermediate position between correlational and experimental research and a purposefully selected sample, it is possible to control for the effects of key moderating variables. This requires the existence of appropriate cases for study. The present study aimed to take a closer look at the effects of the physical boundaries of residential communities on residents’ fear of crime through a causal comparative design and a purposefully selected sample.
METHODS: Employing a causal comparative design approach of a purposive sample of gated, perceived gated, and non-gated communities in Tehran, two communities were selected from each category. Ekbatan, one of the biggest and the most populated neighbourhoods in the Middle East, is a community where three levels of gating can be observed. In some of the communities located in Ekbatan, the residents have enclosed their communities through restricting access points and recruiting guards. In fact, in Ekbatan, gating has been encouraged by residents’ feeling that they have no longer any control over their communities.
FINDINGS: The results show that the residents of the gated communities did not
perceive fear of crime significantly less frequently compared to the residents of nongated
communities. However, the situation is different in perceived gated communities.
The results indicated that the residents of perceived gated communities in Ekbatan
perceived significantly less fear of crime compared to the residents of gated and non-gated
communities. Lower levels of fear of crime were observed in all four components of fear of
crime including worry about fear of crime, perceived likelihood of crime, perceived control
over personal crime, and perceived consequences of crime. The residents of perceived
gated communities are less worried about becoming a victim of crime, feel that there is
less likelihood of crime in their communities, feel that they have more control over crime
if one happened, and, finally, feel that a crime would lead to fewer consequences in their
lives, if one happened.
CONCLUSION: The residents of Ekbatan are increasingly worried about the future of
their neighbourhood due to physical, social, and demographic changes in the context
of their neighbourhood. Many of them feel threatened and are unsure of their place of
residence. This is reflected in the increasing use of fencing as a strategy to control the
physical environment. From the point of view of Ekbatan’s managing committee and
residents, gating might seem to be a reasonable solution for protecting the neighbourhood.
However, the results of this study suggest that gating does not appear to address the
sources of the problem. The results demonstrate that there was no significant difference
between gated and non-gated communities’ residents’ perception of fear of crime and
sense of community in Ekbatan. Protection against violence and criminal activities largely
depends on residents’ active surveillance and gated communities do little to foster this.
Since the living environment is enclosed and guarded, residents are not encouraged to
participate in protecting their neighbourhood and as a result feel no responsibility for
taking care of their place of residence. It seems that gating is at best a temporary solution
to the problem of crime since if someone intended to get into a gated community, they
would find a way to do so. Gating and fencing lead to social segregation and, contrary
to what residents believe, do little to help protect their neighbourhoods. This process
will likely lead to insularity and weaken the social and physical structure of Ekbatan. The
residents of gated communities no longer care about what happens outside walls or even
within the walls. Passive solutions to reducing crime seem ineffective in reducing residents’
fear. However, perceived gated communities, through creating a sense of territoriality and
triggering residents’ active participation in community protection, seem to provide an
effective solution to the problem of crime.
