پديد آورندگان :
دانشپور، عبدالهادي دانشگاه علم و صنعت ايران - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه شهرسازي، تهران، ايران , علي الحسابي، مهران دانشگاه علم و صنعت ايران - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي - گروه شهرسازي، تهران، ايران , حسيني كومله، مصطفي دانشگاه علم و صنعت ايران - دانشكده معماري و شهرسازي، تهران، ايران
كليدواژه :
خاطره جمعي , پژوهش مسئله - محور , مسئله واجد ارزش پژوهشي , ديالكتيك عام و خاص پژوهش
چكيده فارسي :
مخدوش شدن ساختارهاي كالبدي-فعاليتي خاطرهانگيز، تخريب بافتهاي تاريخي، تغيير شيوه زندگي و آسيبهاي جدي وارده به زيستبوم خاطرهانگيز در پي فرآيند مدرنيزاسيون در شهرهاي ايراني، خاطرات جمعي را با چالشهاي گستردهاي روبرو ساخته است. هدف نوشتار حاضر، پيشنهاد چارچوب روششناختي انتخاب مسائل واجد ارزش پژوهش، پيرامون «خاطره جمعي در شهر ايراني» و روش پژوهش، كيفي و تركيبي از رويكرد موردپژوهي (مسائل واجد ارزش پژوهشي دكتري شهرسازي در زمينه «خاطره جمعي») و فراتركيب كيفي مطالعات صورتپذيرفته در زمينه خاطرات جمعي است. در اين نوشتار ضمن تأكيد بر ديالكتيك عام و خاص پژوهش (آموختن علم به مفهوم جهانشمول و بازتوليدش در بستري محلي)، با استفاده از چارچوب روششناختي سهمرحلهاي پيشنهادي («تهيه فهرست اوليه مسائل» ، «برشماري مسائل واجد ارزش پژوهش» بر پايه ارزيابي چهار-مرحلهاي و «تدوين شناسنامه مسائل و ترسيم طرحواره پژوهشهاي پيشنهادي»)، هفت مسئله «انتقال معنا و تداوم خاطره در شهرهاي معاصر»، «برهمخوردن تعادل تغيير، تداوم و ثبات و چالش توليد خاطره»، «عدم پيوند خاطرات با تجارب زيسته»، «فاصله بهخاطرآورندگان با بستر مكاني خاطرات»، «خاطرهزدايي به بهانه مدرنيزاسيون يا انتفاع اقتصادي»، «تغيير سبك زندگي و اثرات آن بر خاطرات جمعي» و «معارضهجويي معاصر انسان ايراني» به عنوان مسائل واجد ارزش پژوهش پيرامون خاطره جمعي در شهر ايراني شناسايي گرديده است.
چكيده لاتين :
Iranian cities have experienced a dramatic change (as a great contemporary challenge) since the last century, leading to a failure of physical, socio-cultural and ecological coherence and confronting collective memories with significant
challenges. In such circumstances, the collective memories of the citizens are forgotten and we are faced with the cities
that are alienated from their pasts whose soul and meaning have completely changed. Demolishing urban historical fabrics,
irreparable damages to the physical, socio-cultural and ecological structure of the cities as well as a substantial change
in lifestyles are some evidence of this drastic change. A change that could entail the need for research about collective
memory in Iranian cities. That is why counting the indigenous research-worthy problems in this field becomes deeply
significant. The aim of this study is to propose a methodological framework about the process of counting the contextbased
challenges and selecting the research-worthy problems -particularly focused on “collective memory in Iranian
cities”- by adopting a problem-based approach and respecting the indigenous originality of the research. This research is
qualitative, and the methodology is a combination of the case study approach (by studying a specific experience in choosing
the research topic of Ph.D. in Urban Planning around "collective memory" as a general topic), qualitative meta-synthesis
of the Iranian researches about collective memory and the methodological texts in the field of problem-based research (in
order to find the method of identifying research-worthy problems). This process has been a reciprocal process between
case study and qualitative content analysis of methodological texts. This means that firstly, after a meta-synthesis of Iranian
researches about collective memory, a study has been conducted on the method of counting research-worthy problems,
considering the need to observe the dialectic of the universal and the particular and indigenous originality of research, the
need to rely on problem-based research and identify the real issues of Iran. Then, the proposed method has been used in
a real case study of choosing the Ph.D. research topic. In this paper, seven problems including “meaning transmission and
memory permanence in the contemporary city”, “an imbalance between change, continuity and constancy: the challenges
of memory production in the contemporary city”, “disassociation between collective memory and lived experiences in the
city”, “the distance between memorizers and memories”, “removing memories in order to gain modern services/ profitmaking”,
“changes in the lifestyle and concepts and its role on citizens collective memories” and “contemporary challenge
and disintegrating the city meaning system” has been identified as the research-worthy problems in the field of collective
memory in the Iranian cities, by using the proposed methodological framework and focusing on indigenous originality of
the research. The final proposed methodological model is based on a three-step process including “preparing the initial
checklist of the problems” resulting from personal and practical observations and experiences, “identifying the researchworthy
problems” through a four-step evaluation of the problems (look, read, synthesize, conclusion) and “preparing concise proposals of possible researches about the problems”.