چكيده فارسي :
ﯾﮑﯽ از ﺑﺨﺶﻫﺎي ﭼﺎﻟﺶﺑﺮاﻧﮕﯿﺰ ﺷـﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ، ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ آن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ آﯾﺎ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ در ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﻣﻄﻤﺢ ﻧﻈﺮ واﻗﻊ ﺷـﻮد ﯾﺎ اﻓﺴﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﯾﯽ ﺳﺮاﭘﺎ ﺑﺸﻮﻟﯿﺪه و ﭘﺮﯾﺸﺎن اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ از آن، ﻃﺮﻓﯽ ﺑﺮﻧﻤﯽﺗﻮان ﺑﺴﺖ. در اﯾﻦ ﺟﺴﺘﺎر، ﺑﺎ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﮥ ﻣﻮردي ﺷﺨﺼﯿّﺖ ﺑﻠﺎش و ﻣﯿﺰان ﻫﻤﮕﻮﻧﯽ رواﯾﺖ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦﻫﺎي دورة اﺳﻠﺎﻣﯽ، روﺷﻦ ﺷــﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺨﺶ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﺷــﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻧﯿﺰ ﻣﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮان ﻣﻨﺒﻌﯽ ﻣﻮﺛﻖ در ﮐﻨﺎر دﯾﮕﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﻟﺤﺎظ ﺷــﻮد ﭼﻨﺎﻧﮑﻪ ﺟﺎﻧﺸــﯿﻨﯽ ﺑﻠﺎش در ﻏﯿﺎب ﻓﯿﺮوز، اﻧﺘﻘﺎل ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ از ﺑﻠﺎش ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﺎد، ﺟﺎﯾﮕﺎه واﻟﺎي ﺳــﻮﺧﺮا در دوران ﭘﺎدﺷـﺎﻫﯽ ﺑﻠﺎش، درﺧﻮاﺳﺖ آﺷﺘﯽ ﺧﻮﺷﻨﻮاز در ﻋﻬﺪ ﺑﻠﺎش، ﭼﻬﺎر ﺳﺎل ﭘﺎدﺷﺎﻫﯽ ﺑﻠﺎش و ﻣﺮدمداري او ﻫﻢ در ﺷـﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ و ﻫﻢ در ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ آﻣﺪه اﺳﺖ و ﻫﻢﺳﻮﯾﯽ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟّﻬﯽ ﺑﯿﻦ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ و ﺗﻮارﯾﺦ ﻋﻬﺪ اﺳﻠﺎﻣﯽ دﯾﺪه ﻣﯽﺷﻮد. در ﻋﯿﻦ ﺣﺎل، ﻫﻤﺎنﻃﻮر ﮐﻪ ﺧﻮد ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﻧﯿﺰ در ﺑﺴــﯿﺎري از ﻣﻮارد اﺧﺘﻠﺎف ﻧﻈﺮ دارﻧﺪ، در ﻣﻮاردي از ﻗﺒﯿﻞ ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ ﻣﻮاﺟﻬﮥ ﻗﺒﺎد ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻠﻄﻨﺖ ﺑﺮادر ﮐﻮﭼﮑﺘﺮش، ﺑﻠﺎش، ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ اﻧﺘﻘﺎل ﻣﺴــﻨﺪ ﻗﺪرت از ﺑﻠﺎش ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﺎد، ﭼﮕﻮﻧﮕﯽ روﯾﺎروﯾﯽ ﺳـﻮﻓﺮا ﺑﺎ ﺧﻮﺷـﻨﻮاز و رﻫﺎﻧﺪن ﻗﺒﺎد و ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷـﺪن ﭼﻨﺪ ﺷﻬﺮ ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖ ﺑﻠﺎش، ﺑﯿﻦ ﺷـﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ و ﻣﺘﻮن ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﮕﻮﻧﯽﻫﺎﯾﯽ دﯾﺪه ﻣﯽﺷـﻮد. ﺑﻨﯿﺎديﺗﺮﯾﻦ ﻧﺎﻫﻤﮕﻮﻧﯽ اﯾﻦ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻠﺎف رواﯾﺖ ﺷـﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺟﺐ آن، ﺑﺪون ﻫﯿﭻ ﺗﻨﺸﯽ، ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ از ﺑﻠﺎش ﺑﻪ ﻗﺒﺎد ﻣﯽرﺳﺪ، در ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﺘﻮن ﺗﺎرﯾﺨﯽ، ﻗﺒﺎد ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳـﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭘﺎدﺷﺎه ﻫﯿﺎﻃﻠﻪ، در ﭘﯽ ﺑﺮﮐﻨﺎري ﺑﻠﺎش ﺑﺮﻣﯽآﯾﺪ، در ﺣﺎﻟﯽ ﮐﻪ اﯾﻦ ﻣﺎﺟﺮا در ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺎﻣﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ ﺑﻌﺪ از ﺧﻠﻊ ﻗﺒﺎد از ﺳﻠﻄﻨﺖ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺮاي ﺑﺮﮐﻨﺎري ﺑﺮادرش ﺟﺎﻣﺎﺳﭗ ﺑﻪ ﻫﯿﺎﻃﻠﻪ ﻣﯽﮔﺮود و ﻧﻪ ﻣﺮﺑﻮط ﺑﻪ ﺑﻠﺎش.
چكيده لاتين :
One of the most challenging points about Shahnameh is its historical part,
including those concepts that can be explored historically and those that are
considered as outdated legends and that cannot be trusted as real history. In
this paper, through a case study of Balash, the degree of the convergence
of the Shahnameh stories with the Islamic sources is measure. As it has
emerged, the historical part of Shahnameh can be regarded as a reliable
source along with other historical sources. The succession of Balash during
the absence of Firouz, the transfer of monarchy from Balash to Ghobad, the
supreme position of Sukhra during the reign of Balash, the reconciliation
request of Khoshnavaz in Balash period, the four years of the kingdom of
Balash and his justice and tolerance have been narrated in both Shahnameh
and historical sources. There is also an interesting similarity between
Shahnameh and the historical Islamic texts. But even historical sources
themselves disagree in many cases; the confrontation of Ghobad with the
reign of his younger brother, the way of transferring the power from Balash
to Ghobad, the confrontation Sufra with Khoshnavaz and the several cities
built just point to differences between Balash in Shahnameh and that in
historical texts. The most fundamental difference is that, contrary to
Shahnameh, in which monarchy transfers from Balash to Ghbad without
any tension, in most historical texts, Ghobad resorts to Khoshnavaz to
overthrow Balash. In Shahnameh, this occurs after the reign of Ghobad and
the removal of his brother Gamasp, not Balash
