تبيين جامعه شناختي تأثير محروميت اجتماعي بر عهدشكني مردان و زنان(مطالعۀ موردي: استان خراسان رضوي)

Sociological Explanation of the Effect of Social Exclusion on Men and Women Breaking the Covenant (Case study: Khorasan Razavi Province)

ﭘﺪﯾﺪة ﺷﮑﺎف ﻧﺴﻠﯽ و ﮔﺴﺘﺮش ﺗﻔﺎوت ﺳﺒﮏ زﻧﺪﮔﯽﻫﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﭘﺪﯾﺪآﻣﺪن ﻓﺎﺻﻠﮥ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ در ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده ﺷـﺪه اﺳـﺖ و ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖﻫـﺎي ﻧﺴـﺒﯽ ﻣﻮﺟـﻮد در ﺧﺎﻧﻮادهﻫـﺎ ﺑﺴـﺘﺮ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ را اﯾﺠﺎد ﮐﺮده اﺳﺖ. وﺟﻮد رواﺑﻂ ﻋﺎﻃﻔﯽ ﮐﻢرﻧـﮓ، ﻧﺎرﺿـﺎﯾﺘﯽ ﺷـﻐﻠﯽ و ﺑﯿﮑـﺎري، اﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﯽ رﻓﺘﺎرﮐﺮدن زوﺟﯿﻦ و ارﺿﺎﻧﺸﺪن ﻧﯿﺎزﻫﺎي ﻓﺮدي در ﺧﺎﻧﻮاده، ﻫﻤﮕﯽ در ﺷـﮑﻞﮔﯿـﺮي زﻧﺎن و ﻣﺮدان ﻋﻬﺪﺷﮑﻦ ﺳﻬﯿﻢ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﮐﻪ از ﻧﻮع ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ-ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠـﯽ ﺑـﻮد، ﺑـﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺖ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ و اﺑﻌﺎد آن ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﺷﮑﻨﯽ زوﺟﯿﻦ در اﺳﺘﺎن ﺧﺮاﺳﺎن رﺿﻮي اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪه اﺳـﺖ. ﺣﺠـﻢ ﻧﻤﻮﻧـﻪ 379 ﻧﻔـﺮ ﺑـﺎ اﺳـﺘﻔﺎده از ﺗﮑﻨﯿـﮏ ﮐـﻮﮐﺮان و روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮي ﺳﻬﻤﯿﻪاي ﺑﻮد. ﺑﺮاي اﻋﺘﺒﺎر ﭘﺮﺳﺸﻨﺎﻣﻪ از آﻟﻔـﺎي ﮐﺮوﻧﺒـﺎخ و رواﯾـﯽ آن از ﺗﺤﻠﯿـﻞ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ آزﻣﻮن ﺗﯽ ﻧﺸـﺎن داد ﺑـﯿﻦ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ اﺟﺘﻤـﺎﻋﯽ و اﺑﻌـﺎد آن ﻣﺎﻧﻨـﺪ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ ﻣﺎدي و ﻏﯿﺮﻣﺎدي ﺑﺎ ﻋﻬﺪﺷﮑﻨﯽ راﺑﻄﮥ ﻣﻌﻨﺎدار وﺟـﻮد داﺷـﺖ. ﻣﻘـﺎدﯾﺮ رﮔﺮﺳـﯿﻮﻧﯽ ﻣﺪل ﻣﻌﺎدﻟﮥ ﺳـﺎﺧﺘﺎري ﺣـﺎﮐﯽ ازآن ﺑـﻮد ﮐـﻪ ﻣﺘﻐﯿـﺮ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ از ﻣﺸـﺎرﮐﺖ اﺟﺘﻤـﺎﻋﯽ ﺑـﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﺷﮑﻨﯽ زوﺟﯿﻦ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ ﻧﺪاﺷﺖ )0/05 >p (. ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ از ﺷﺒﮑﮥ رواﺑﻂ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان 0/29، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ آﻣﻮزﺷﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان0/26 ، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ از اوﻗـﺎت ﻓﺮاﻏـﺖ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﯿـﺰان 0/47، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ ﻓﮑﺮي ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان 0/17، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ از درآﻣـﺪ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﯿـﺰان 0/51، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ ﺷﻐﻠﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﯿﺰان 0/30 و ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ از ﭘﺮﺳﺘﯿﮋ اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﯽ ﺑـﻪ ﻣﯿـﺰان 0/10 ﻣـﺆﺛﺮ ﺑـﻮد )0/05 < p(. درﻣﺠﻤﻮع، ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿﺖ از اوﻗـﺎت ﻓﺮاﻏـﺖ ﺑﯿﺸـﺘﺮﯾﻦ و ﻣﺤﺮوﻣﯿـﺖ از ﭘﺮﺳـﺘﯿﮋ اﺟﺘﻤـﺎﻋﯽ ﮐﻤﺘﺮﯾﻦ ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ را ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﺷﮑﻨﯽ زوﺟﯿﻦ داﺷﺘﻨﺪ.

Weak emotional relationships, job dissatisfaction and unemployment, selective behavior of couples, dissatisfaction with individual needs in the family can all explain why men and women break their covenant. The present study, which is a descriptive-analytical study, has been conducted with the aim of recognizing the effect of social deprivation and its dimensions on couples breaking their covenant in Khorasan Razavi Province. The sample size is 379 people determined using the Cochran technique and quota sampling method. Cronbach's alpha and factor analysis were used to validate the questionnaire. The results of the t-test showed that social deprivation and its dimensions such as material and immaterial deprivation had a significant relationship with breaking the covenant. The regression values of the structural equation model indicated that the variable of the deprivation of social participation had no effect on the couple's breach of the covenant, because their significance level (p) was greater than 0.05. Also, the deprivation of social relations network to the extent of 0.29, educational deprivation to the extent of 0.26, the deprivation of leisure time to the extent of 0.47, intellectual deprivation to the extent of 0.17, the deprivation of income to the extent of 0.51, job deprivation to the extent of 0.30, the deprivation of social prestige to the extent of 0.10 were effective. This was due to their significance level (p) which was less than 0.05. In general, the deprivation of leisure time had the most effect, while the deprivation of social prestige had the least effect on breaking a couple's covenant.