كليدواژه :
طبيعت , كانت , گردشگري طبيعي , غايت شناسي , زيباشناسي گردشگري
چكيده فارسي :
هدف مقاله مطالعه نگرش كانت به طبيعت در نقد سوم بر اساسِ مولفههاي گرايش گردشگري طبيعي است. قصد اين است با روش توصيفي-تحليلي، به اين پرسش پاسخ دهيم: چگونه و براساس چه مولفههايي ميتوان از نقد سوم كانت چارچوبي براي زيباشناسي گردشگري فراهم كرد؟. مطالعات پژوهش نشان ميدهد براي ترتيبدادن به چارچوب زيباشناسي گردشگري براساس نقدسوم كانت بهتر است مولفههاي اساسي بخش نقد قوه حكم غايتشناختي را ابتدا طرح كرد. در بخش دوم نقد سوم با توجه به جايگاه ارگانيستي طبيعت و غايتمندي آن و نيز بسط مكانيستي طبيعت تحت اصل فوق محسوس ضمن رفع تناقض اين دوگانه، درباره نقش غايات طبيعت و انسان به عنوان غايت واپسين بحث شده است. در اين بخش زاويه ديد گستردهاي براي رابطه انسان و طبيعت با توجه به غايت واپسين و فرجامين ديده ميشود. انسان با توجه به زاويه ديد كلي، از بخش غايتها و شناخت جايگاه خود به عنوان غايت واپسين و عنايت به غايت فرجامين، به زاويه ديد جزييتر در تأمل بر جلوهها و جاذبههاي طبيعي و زيباييهاي آزاد و وابسته متكي به طبيعت، مصنوعات و آثار هنري دست مييابد. در نتيجه نقش زيبايي و والايي طبيعت در پرورش بعد اخلاقي و اعتلاي فرهنگ انسان به منزلة يكي از پايههاي اساسي زيباشناسي گردشگري بهويژه طبيعي مطرح ميشود.
چكيده لاتين :
In this research, we intend to examine Immanuel Kant's definition of nature in his critique of judgment in both parts, i.e., aesthetics and teleology. Then, we will evaluate these definitions of nature with the criteria of different trends of tourism such as nature tourism. Then we answer the question: Do Kant's definitions of nature in teleology and the relationship of nature with beauty and sublimity and the examples mentioned in this book, provide a proper Criteria for the goals, aspirations, and scopes of nature tourism? Do tourists of nature take us for a walk in the nature that Kant defines or sometimes describes? Supposedly, both have a lot in common with emphasis on human ends and the importance of morality in praising beauty of nature. We search with a descriptive-analytical method to answer this question: How can a framework for aesthetics of tourism be provided from Kant's third critique? Research studies show that in order to organize the framework of aesthetics of tourism based on Kant's third critique, it is better to first outline the basic rubrics of the critique of the teleological judgment. In the second part of the third critique, considering the organic position of nature and its purpose and also the mechanistic expansion of nature under the supersensible principle, while eliminating the contradiction of this duality, the role of the purpose of nature and human as the ultimate purpose are discussed. In this part, an expansive view is seen for the relationship between man and nature with regard to the ultimate purpose and final purpose. According to the general point of view, human being, from the purposes and recognizing his/her position as the ultimate purpose and paying attention to the final purpose, will reach to a more detailed point of view. Human being, reflects on natural effects and charms and free and dependent beauties based on nature, artifacts and artworks. As a result, the role of beauty and sublimity of nature in cultivating the moral dimension and the promotion of human culture is considered as one of the basic foundations of aesthetics of tourism, especially nature tourism.