عنوان مقاله :
Grammar Instruction to Young Adolescents at Lower Proficiency Levels Through Metacognitive Intervention
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
No Title
پديد آورندگان :
Hossein, Bozorgian Department of Language and Literature - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences - University of Mazandaran - Babolsar, Iran , Sediqeh, Fallahpour Department of Language and Literature - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences - University of Mazandaran - Babolsar, Iran , Meysam, Muhammadpour Department of Language and Literature - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences - University of Mazandaran - Babolsar, Iran
كليدواژه :
metacognitive intervention , young adolescents , grammatical performance , first language (L1) , English as a foreign language (EFL)
چكيده فارسي :
اين مقاله فاقد چكيده فارسي است.
چكيده لاتين :
Knowing how to think about the language learning process is
conducive to effective learning especially in the case of grammar
structures. Metacognition, a concept derived from cognitive
psychology, can assist learners in this case. With regard to young
adolescents at lower proficiency levels, there is a long-standing
debate on whether to use L1 for teaching metacognitive strategies
since learners might not be efficient enough in terms of
understanding the concept of metacognition. Therefore, this smallscale
experimental study focused on the effect of grammar
instruction through the metacognitive intervention delivered in L1 on
the EFL pre-intermediate learners' grammatical performance in
English and investigated their attitudes towards grammar instruction
delivered in L1. To fulfill these purposes, a homogenous group of 20
language learners was randomly divided into an experimental group
(n =10), which received grammar instruction through the
metacognitive intervention delivered in L1, and a control group (n
=10), which received the instruction only in English without
grammar instruction through the metacognitive intervention
delivered in L1. The results of the independent samples t-test
indicated that the experimental group did not outperform the control
group in terms of all four English grammar points, namely present
perfect, simple past tense, comparative and superlative adjectives,
and past progressive. In addition, the findings obtained from the fivepoint
Likert scale questionnaire which was distributed among the
learners suggested that they had positive attitudes towards the use of
L1 (Persian) in teaching English grammar. We argue that low
working memory capacity, overreliance on translation, and lesscognitively
activated L2 processes may account for the low
performance of the experimental group learners in the grammar tests.
The implication is that the L1 use in an L2 classroom can be helpful
in teaching L2 grammar through the metacognitive intervention, but
future studies need to examine how and to what extent L1 should be
used to yield more effective results in the case of lower-proficiency
learners in an EFL context.
عنوان نشريه :
جستارهاي زباني