مروري بر معيارهاي مديريت يكپارچه منابع در زيرساخت ابر با استفاده از رويكرد نرم افزار محور

A Survey on the Criteria of the Integrated Resource Management for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Based on the Software-defined Approach

اﺳﺘﻔﺎدهي ﺑﻬﯿﻨﻪ از ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ از دﻏﺪﻏﻪﻫﺎي اﺻﻠﯽ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﯽ ﺳﺎزﻣﺎنﻫﺎ و ﻓﺮاﻫﻢﮐﻨﻨﺪﮔﺎن ﺧﺪﻣﺖ اﺳﺖ. ﻫﺪف از ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎت اﺑﺮي، ﻓﺮاﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻮدن ﻣﺨﺰﻧﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﺤﺪود از ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺑﺮاي ﭘﺎﺳﺦ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ درﺧﻮاﺳﺘﯽ اﺳﺖ. ﻻﯾﻪي زﯾﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ ﺑﻪﻋﻨﻮان ﺧﺪﻣﺖ اﺑﺮ، ﻣﺴﺌﻮل ﻓﺮاﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻮدن ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﻮردﻧﯿﺎز ﺧﺪﻣﺎت اﺑﺮي اﺳﺖ. اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺷﺎﻣﻞ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﺤﺎﺳﺒﺎﺗﯽ، ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺷﺒﮑﻪاي و ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ذﺧﯿﺮهﺳﺎزي اﺳﺖ. روﯾﮑﺮدﻫﺎي ﺟﺎري در زﯾﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ اﺑﺮ از ﺳﻪ ﺳﯿﺴﺘﻢ ﺟﺪاﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻫﺮ ﯾﮏ از اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﻣﯽﮐﻨﻨﺪ. ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﻣﺠﺰّاي ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ زﯾﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ اﺑﺮ ﻧﻤﯽﺗﻮاﻧﺪ ﭘﺎﺳﺦﮔﻮي ﻧﺮماﻓﺰارﻫﺎ و ﺧﺪﻣﺖﻫﺎي ﭼﻨﺪرﺳﺎﻧﻪاي ﮐﻪ ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﺳﻄﺢ ﮐﯿﻔﯿﺖ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺗﻀﻤﯿﻦﺷﺪه ﻧﯿﺎز دارﻧﺪ، ﺑﺎﺷﺪ. از ﻃﺮﻓﯽ ﮐﺎراﯾﯽ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ زﯾﺮﺳﺎﺧﺖ اﺑﺮ واﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﯾﮑﭙﺎرﭼﻪي اﯾﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ اﺳﺖ. در اﯾﻦ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ اﺑﺘﺪا ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺮﻓﯽ دو ﺳﯿﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﯾﮑﭙﺎرﭼﻪي ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﻣﯽﭘﺮدازﯾﻢ. ﺳﭙﺲ اﻫﺪاف، ﻣﻌﯿﺎرﻫﺎي اﺻﻠﯽ و زﯾﺮ ﻣﻌﯿﺎرﻫﺎي ﺳﯿﺴﺘﻢ ﻣﺪﯾﺮﯾﺖ ﯾﮑﭙﺎرﭼﻪي ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ را ﺷﺮح ﻣﯽدﻫﯿﻢ. درﻧﻬﺎﯾﺖ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ وﯾﮋﮔﯽﻫﺎي ﻫﺮ ﯾﮏ از ﺳﯿﺴﺘﻢﻫﺎي ﻣﻌﺮﻓﯽﺷﺪه، ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﯾﺴﻪ آنﻫﺎ ﻣﯽﭘﺮدازﯾﻢ.

The optimal resource utilization is an important concern for the organizations and the service providers. The goal of cloud computing is to provide the unlimited reservoir of resources for responding to all the requests coming from the workloads and applications. The IaaS layer is responsible for providing physical and virtual resources (compute, network and storage resources) for upper layers. Current approaches in cloud infrastructure, use three separate management systems for each of these resources. Separate management of cloud infrastructure resources cannot respond effectively and efficiently to the applications and multimedia services which require guaranteed quality of services. The performance of the cloud infrastructure resources relates to the integration of the resource management. In this paper we first describe two resource integration management systems. Then we describe the goals, the criteria and sub-criteria of resource integration management system. At the end, we compare these two systems based on their feature sets and the mentioned criteria and sub-criteria.