مقدمه
هدف از انجام مطالعه بررسي تاثير داروي سيلوستازول بر نتايج حاصل از آنژيوپلاستي شرياني زير زانو بود
روش كار
مطالعه به صورت كار آزمايي باليني تصادفي كنترل شده بر روي 50 بيمار كانديد بالون آنژيوپلاستي زير زانو انجام شد. بيماران در دو گروه 25 نفري به صورت تصادفي در دو گروه مصرف كننده پلاويكس به تنهايي (گروه A) و گروه مصرف كننده پلاويكس و سيلوستازول (گروه B) وارد مطالعه شدند و طي دوره 3 ماهه از نظر حفظ اندام، نياز به درمان اندوواسكولار مجدد ، بهبود علايم باليني و زخم ايسكميك و ميزان بروز عوارض مورد بررسي قرار گرفتند
نتايج
بيماران دو گروه از لحاظ مشخصات دموگرافيك و باليني با يكديگر تفاوت معنادار نداشتند (0/05
P) ميزان نياز به مداخله جراحي در گروه A بيشتر از گروه B بود اما تفاوت معنادار نبود (0/05
چكيده لاتين :
Background and Objectives The study aimed to evaluate cilostazol's effects on balloon angioplasty for
infrapopliteal artery disease.
Subjects and Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial study was performed on 50 patients undergoing
below-the-knee balloon angioplasty. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups:
Plavix alone (Group A) and Plavix and cilostazol (Group B). During the 3 months, limb salvage, need for
endovascular re-treatment, improvement of clinical symptoms, and incidence of adverse effects were
compared between the two groups.
Results There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding demographic and clinical
characteristics (P >0.05). Significant improvements in symptoms were observed in group B. The improvements
were seen in the rest pain and intermittent claudication within 3 months after treatment
(P <0.05). The need for surgical intervention in group A was higher than in group B three months after
treatment, but the difference was insignificant (P >0.05). None of the patients had reported heart failure
within three months of treatment.
Conclusion Although cilostazol administration after below-the-knee balloon angioplasty in patients with
lower limb ischemia has a positive effect on improving symptoms such as rest pain and intermittent
claudication, it did not show a positive effect on limb salvage, ischemic wound healing, and need for
re-intervention. This study also showed no significant difference in cilostazol users with cardiac complications
and gastrointestinal bleeding.