شماره ركورد :
1290581
عنوان مقاله :
هويت ملي روسيه در دوران پساشوروي؛ تغيير يا تداوم هويتي
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Russia's National Identity in the Post-Soviet Era; Change or Continuity
پديد آورندگان :
سلطاني، عليرضا دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد تهران مركزي - دانشكده علوم سياسي - گروه روابط بين الملل , خانمحمدي، زهره دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد تهران مركزي - دانشكده علوم سياسي - گروه روابط بين الملل
تعداد صفحه :
29
از صفحه :
172
از صفحه (ادامه) :
0
تا صفحه :
200
تا صفحه(ادامه) :
0
كليدواژه :
اقتدارگرايي , پساشوروي , روسيه , سازه انگاري , قدرت بزرگ , هويت ملي
چكيده فارسي :
فدراسيون روسيه با فروپاشي اتحاد شوروي شكل گرفت، اما دولتي قديمي محسوب مي‌شود كه برخلاف تغيير مكرر نامش، از ديدگاه هويتي توانسته است در سه دورۀ اصلي تاريخ، تزارها، شوروي و پساشوري (روسيۀ مدرن) ويژگي‌هاي اصلي هويتي خود را حفظ كند. به‌ بياني، ورود روسيه از دوره‌اي به دورۀ ديگر كه نخست با انقلاب 1917 و سپس با فروپاشي همراه بود، سبب شد در ساختار و فرهنگ سياسي دولت تغيير ايجاد شود، اما شاخص‌هاي اصلي هويت روسي دچار تغيير نشده است؛ زيرا تعريف هويت روسي بر اساس شاخص‌ ملي (اقتدارطلبي) و بين‌المللي (قدرت بزرگ) از عصر تزارها تا استالين و پوتين در عصر مدرن تداوم دارد. نمادهاي عيني اين شاخص‌ها در دورۀ پساشوروي آشكار است كه از نظر بيشتر نويسندگان، روسيه در اوج سرگشتگي هويتي و در تلاش براي يافتن هويتي مستقل به‌سر مي‌برد. با توجه به آنچه گفتيم، اين پرسش مطرح مي‌شود كه چگونه فروپاشي اتحاد شوروي بر ادراك رهبران و مردم روسيه در مورد هويت ملي اثر گذاشت؟ در پاسخ اين فرضيه مطرح مي‌شود كه فروپاشي اتحاد شوروي مرزها و وابستگي‌هاي شوروي را دچار تغيير و فروپاشي كرد، اما ادراك مردم و رهبران از مفهوم هويت ملي بر اساس اقتدارطلبي و قدرت بزرگ از دوره‌هاي پيشين تداوم يافته و دچار تغيير نشده است. در اين نوشتار تبيين و تحليل موضوع را با استفاده از رويكرد تفسيري روش تاريخي‌- تطبيقي و آزمون فرضيه را در چارچوب نظريۀ سازه‌انگاري با تأكيد بر مؤلفۀ هويت انجام مي‌دهيم.
چكيده لاتين :
Introduction: Identity Issue was a crucial issue in Post-Soviet Russia between the scholars. Some scholars see Russia as an existing entity tasked with testing different socio-political contexts because identity-building is complex to face serious and new challenges. Contrary to view as mentioned above and other scholars who believe that identity has changed in the post-Soviet era, we say that identity as a dynamic concept is the basis of socio-political actions. While the identity is based on the indicators of "authoritarianism and great power" in Russia in the three historical periods of the Tsars, the Soviet unio‎n, the post-Soviet unio‎ns (modern Russia), it has continued and will continue in the future. Research question: How has the collapse of the USSR affected the Russian leaders and nation's perception of National Identity? Research hypothesis: This hypothesis suggests the collapse of the Soviet unio‎n, and although it has changed borders and geopolitics, the perceptions of Russian leaders and nations based on authoritarianism and the concepts of great power have continued. The Methodology: Data collection method in this study is based on the library documentary. Analysis of the data will be performed in the format of the interpretative approach of the historic-comparative method, which Theda Skocpol emphasizes. As in this method, historical comparisons are made on the validity of keywords, throughout the article, keywords such as "authoritarianism", "nationalism", "great power", and "national identity" are analyzed in three historical periods. The hypothesis test is applied based on the concept of identity in constructive theory. The theory is based on an interpretive approach and finally the hypothesis is confirmed based on the method and theory. Result and Discussion: Russian identity on the basis of authoritarianism factor on the national level rooted in the religious thinking in the Tsar era, which developed under the Byzantine. This thought made to parallel the "God & TSARS" idea. Although dissatisfaction was the main factor among people in the Soviet era, making the industrial economy & overcoming Nazi Germany-made to become Stalin popular more and more even today. Putin created public satisfaction in modern Russia by overcoming internal challenges such as corruption, making rules sovereignty, making security. In addition, Putin called himself a "patriot" increased his popularity among Russians till 2021. Great Power on the international level has been described based on Tsar's dominance over north to south and their expansionism idea as a whole. In Soviet era, the characteristics of power policy changed basically and the leaders introduced themselves as Communist revolution leading and leader of Communism World. Putin understood the “Great Power” concept as a historical & holy pillar of Russian identity. He believed that other powers, especially the West, had to accept Russia and respect him (as a great power) regardless of its economic and technological conditions Studying these facts about Russia on the national and international level from Tsar to the modern era showed that Russian Identity based on "authoritarianism" and "Great Power" has continuously affected the minds of Russian foreign policymakers and nations. So, we can get the result that the collapse of the Soviet unio‎n did not follow independent national Identity. Conclusion: Studying Russian Identity based on "authoritarianism" and "Great Power" has continuously affected the minds of Russian foreign policymakers and nations. So, the collapse of the Soviet unio‎n did not make following independent national identity. Although borders have changed in the post-Soviet era and new republics have been created, Putin exercised authoritarianism within the (self) state and was accepted by the people within the (other) nation. Russia's position as a great power is a part of Russian Identity, which mainly lies in the Russian identity understanding in the Tsar and Soviet-unio‎n eras and plays a crucial role in the post-Soviet period. In Tsarist Russia, the perception of great power belonged to the leader of the Orthodox world and sometimes its expansion to other regions. The role of Moscow in the Soviet unio‎n is emphasized in the leader of the communist world and finally, Putin understood the "great power" concept as a historic pillar of Russian identity which other powers especially the west has to accept and respect regardless of his economic and technological position. Finally, we must return to the basic hypothesis of constructivists such as Alexander Went, who states: "Identity is a mental personality rooted in the actor's understanding of himself and others. It can be added that border and geopolitical changes have not affected this perception.
سال انتشار :
1400
عنوان نشريه :
مطالعات اوراسياي مركزي
فايل PDF :
8696976
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت