رابطه حد ارتداد و مدعي امامت

The Relationship between the Restriction of Apostasy and the Claimant of Imamate

ﭼﮑﯿﺪه: اﻣﺎﻣﯿﻪ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ ادﻟﮥ ﻣﺤﮑﻢ ﻋﻘﻠﯽ و ﻧﻘﻠﯽ، اﻣﺎﻣﺖ را ﻣﻨﺼﺒﯽ اﻟﻬﯽ داﻧﺴﺘﻪ و ﻣﻌﺘﻘﺪ اﺳﺖ اﯾﻤﺎن ﺑﻪ دوازده اﻣﺎم ﺑﻪ ﻧﺤﻮ ﻋﺎم از ﺟﻤﻠﻪ ﺿﺮورﯾﺎت ﻣﺬﻫﺐ اﺳﺖ و از آﻧﺠﺎ ﮐﻪ اﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﺟﺰء اﺻﻮل دﯾﻦ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ، ادﻋﺎي اﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ اﯾﻦ اﻣﺮ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﺎت داﺷﺘﻪ و ارﺗﺪاد از ﻣﺬﻫﺐ و دﯾﻦ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ. اﯾﻦ ﻧﻮﺷﺘﺎر ﺑﻪ روش ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪاي ﻧﮕﺎﺷﺘﻪ ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ. ﭘﺮﺳﺶ اﺻﻠﯽ اﯾﻦﮐﻪ ﺷﺎرع ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺪﻋﯿﺎن اﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﭼﻪ ﺣﺪي در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ؟ ﻫﺪف اﺻﻠﯽ ﻣﻘﺎﻟﻪ ﺗﻌﯿﯿﻦ ﺣﺪ ارﺗﺪاد ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺪﻋﯿﺎن اﻣﺎﻣﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺷﺎرع اﺳﺖ. ﻓﺮﺿﯿﻪ اﺻﻠﯽ اﯾﻦ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﺷﺎرع ﺑﺮاي ﻣﺪﻋﯿﺎن اﻣﺎﻣﺖ، ﺣﺪ در ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺖ. ﺑﺮ اﺳﺎس ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮاردي ﭼﻮن ادﻟﻪ ارﺗﺪاد، ادﻟﻪ وﺟﻮب اﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﺮوف و ﻧﻬﯽ از ﻣﻨﮑﺮ، ادﻟﻪ وﺟﻮب ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ ﺗﻌﺰﯾﺮ و ... ، ادﻋﺎي ﻣﻬﺪوﯾﺖ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺠﺎزات روﺑﺮو اﺳﺖ و ﻣﯿﺰان اﯾﻦ ﻣﺠﺎزات ﺑﺴﺘﮕﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺤﺪوده ﻓﻌﺎﻟﯿﺖ ﻣﺪﻋﯽ و ﻣﯿﺰان ﺗﺨﻠﻒ و .. ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ داﺷﺖ.

Based on strong intellectual and narrative evidence, Imamiyyah considers Imamate as a divine position and believes that belief in twelve Imams is generally one of the wisdoms of religion, and since Imamate is part of the principles of religion, the claim of Imamate contradicts this matter and it is apostasy from religion. This article is written in a library method. The main question is: what extent the legislator has considered for the claimants of Imamate? The main purpose is to determine the extent of apostasy for the claimants of Imamate with the opinion of the legislator. The main hypothesis is that the legislator has set a limit for the claimants of Imamate. Results show, citing cases such as the reasons for apostasy, the reasons for the necessity of enjoining the good and forbidding the evil, the reasons for the necessity of the rules of ta'zir, the claim of Mahdism faces punishment and the amount of this punishment depends on the scope of the plaintiff will have.