بررسي تاثير آموزش دگر امدادي در بحران بر دانش، نگرش و عملكرد سربازان

The Effect of Buddy Aid Education in Crisis on Knowledge, Attitude and Performance of Soldiers

زمينه و هدف كشور ما در معرض انواع مخاطرات طبيعي و انسان ساخت قرار دارد. نيروهاي مسلح با بهره گيري از قابليت توزيع منطقه اي بسيار مناسب و قابليت اقدام سريع جزء اولين سازمان هايي است كه در بحران حضور دارد. لذا اين مطالعه با هدف تعيين تاثير آموزش دگرامدادي در بحران بر دانش، نگرش و عملكرد سربازان طراحي شد. روش ها مطالعه حاضر يك مطالعه تجربي و دو گروهي است كه در سال 1396 انجام شد. دو يگان از يگان هاي مستقر در شهر خرم آباد به صورت تصادفي ساده به دو گروه آزمون و مقايسه تخصيص يافت. در هر گروه (آزمون و مقايسه) 25 نفر از سربازان به صورت تصادفي ساده انتخاب شدند. براي گروه آزمون شش جلسه دو ساعته آموزش دگرامدادي به صورت آموزش تركيبي توسط محقق برگزار شد. براي گروه مقايسه مداخله اي از سوي محقق انجام نگرفت و آموزش گروه مقايسه طبق روال سابق به روش سخنراني انجام شد. جهت جمع آوري داده ها از پرسشنامه هاي دانش و نگرش و 5 فهرست وارسي محقق ساخته روا و پايا استفاده شد. پرسشنامه ها و چك ليست ها قبل و يك هفته بعد از مداخله توسط واحد هاي مورد پژوهش در هر دو گروه آزمون و مقايسه تكميل شد. براي تجزيه و تحليل داده ها از آزمون هاي آماري دقيق فيشر، تي مستقل و تي زوجي استفاده شد. يافته ها دو گروه از نظر مشخصات دموگرافيك اختلاف معناداري نداشتند (0/05P) به طوري كه نمره گروه آزمون در هر دو حيطه دانش و عملكرد بالاتر بود. اما اختلاف معني داري بين دو گروه آزمون و مقايسه در حيطه نگرش وجود نداشت (0/05

Background and Aim: Our country is exposed to all kinds of natural and man-made hazards. The armed forces with the ability of regional distribution and quick action, are one of the first organizations to become present in crisis. Therefore, this study was designed to determine the effect of buddy aid education on the knowledge, attitude, and performance of soldiers. Methods: The present study is an experimental and two-group study conducted in 2017. Two units from which settled in Khorramabad were randomly allocated to two experimental and comparison groups. 25 soldiers from each group (experimental and comparison) were selected by simple random sampling. The researcher held six two-hour sessions of buddy aid education in the form of combination training for the experimental group. No intervention was performed by the researcher for the comparison group and like the previous procedure, the training of the comparison group was carried out by lecture method. Knowledge and attitude questionnaires and 5 valid and reliable researcher-made checklists were used to collect data. Questionnaires and checklists were completed before and one week after the intervention by the research units in both experimental and comparison groups. Fisher's test, independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test were used to analyze the data. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics (P >0.05). Besides, there was no significant difference between the two groups in knowledge, attitude and practice before the intervention (P >0.05). After the educational intervention, there was a significant difference between the two experimental and comparison groups in the mean scores of the knowledge areas and the 5 cases of performance (fracture care, bleeding control, transportation of the injured by firefighting procedures, stick and crawl methods) (P >0.05) so that the test group score was higher in both knowledge and performance. There was no significant difference between the two experimental and comparison groups in the attitude (P >0.05). Conclusion: Given the important and wide role of armed forces in crisis, training of duty personnel through a coherent training program and holding of training classes with an emphasis on practical training is recommended.