معماي كاتبي در پرتو حكمت متعاليه

Katibiʹs Puzzle in the Light of the Transcendent Philosophy

The presentation of a comprehensive report of all available criticisms and their evaluation will be greatly revealing concerning logiciansʹ methodology and epistemology. Their deliberations and insights concerning the issue of relation and criticizing the inferential principles that are based on this concept, as well as the evaluation of the efficiency of the issue, have appeared in different forms. Conceptual criticisms lead to new conceptualizations, and the posing of contradictory examples for inferential principles consolidates the principles themsleves and, in certain cases, leads to the discovery of new ones. Some of the criticisms in the history of logic are known as logical puzzles. It should be emphasized that in their process of historical development, a lot of responses have been given to such puzzles, and that they have been good targets for a host of objections; however, all the responses and objections have been at the service of merely strengthening their forms of ambiguity or paradox, such as `Katibiʹs Puzzleʹ. Such criticisms are targeted at the problems and issues related to the field of relation. If these issues are discovered, the pervious research studies, which are each relatod to a specific topic, will continue in a focused line of activity. It goes without saying that studies of this kind possess undeniable advatages in practice in the mould of logical deliberations and criticism.