شماره ركورد :
1300591
عنوان مقاله :
ﻋﺪم ﻣﺮزاﻧﮕﺎري ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ اﻋﺘﺒﺎري و ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ و ﺗﺄﺛﯿﺮ آن در ﻓﻬﻢ ﮔﺰارهﻫﺎي ﻓﻘﻬﯽ و ﺣﻘﻮﻗﯽ
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
The lack of demarcation of credit and real concepts and its effect on the understanding of jurisprudence and legal propositions
پديد آورندگان :
رﺳﺘﻤﯽ ﻧﺠﻒ آﺑﺎدي، ﺣﺎﻣﺪ داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﻣﺬاﻫﺐ اﺳﻼﻣﯽ ﺗﻬﺮان - ﮔﺮوه ﻓﻘﻪ و ﺣﻘﻮق اﻣﺎﻣﯿﻪ، ﺗﻬﺮان، اﯾﺮان , ﭘﻮرﺑﺎﻓﺮاﻧﯽ، ﻣﺤﻤﻮد داﻧﺸﮕﺎه ﺧﻮارزﻣﯽ ﺗﻬﺮان - رﺷﺘﻪ ﻓﻘﻪ و ﺣﻘﻮق ﺧﺼﻮﺻﯽ، ﺗﻬﺮان، اﯾﺮان
تعداد صفحه :
22
از صفحه :
279
از صفحه (ادامه) :
0
تا صفحه :
300
تا صفحه(ادامه) :
0
كليدواژه :
ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ اﻋﺘﺒﺎري , ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ , ﮔﺰارهﻫﺎي ﻓﻘﻬﯽ , ﮔﺰارهﻫﺎي ﺣﻘﻮﻗﯽ , ﻋﺪم ﻣﺮزاﻧﮕﺎري ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ اﻋﺘﺒﺎري و ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ , ﻓﻬﻢ ﮔﺰارهﻫﺎي ﻓﻘﻬﯽ و ﺣﻘﻮﻗﯽ
چكيده فارسي :
ﻋﺪم ﺗﻔﮑﯿﮏ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ از اﻋﺘﺒﺎري، ﭼﺎﻟﺸﯽ ﻓﻘﻬﯽ اﺳﺖ ﮐﻪ ﮔﺎه ﻣﻮﺟﺐ ﺑﺮداﺷﺖﻫﺎي ﻧﺎدرﺳﺖ و ﭘﯿﺎﻣﺪﻫﺎي ﻋﻤﻠﯽ ﻧﺎﻣﻄﻠﻮب در ﺣﻮزه ﻣﻌﺎﻣﻼت ﻣﯽﺷﻮد. از آنﺟﺎ ﮐﻪ اﻣﺮ ﺧﻼف ﻣﻘﺘﻀﺎي ذات ﻋﻘﺪ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺟﻌﻞ ﻧﺒﻮده و در ﻋﻘﺪ ﺷﺮط ﻧﻤﯽﺷﻮد، اﻟﺰامآور ﺑﻮدن ﺟﺮﯾﺎن ﻗﻮاﻋﺪ ﺣﺎﮐﻢ ﺑﺮ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ در اﻋﺘﺒﺎرﯾﺎت، اﻣﺮي ﻣﺴﻠﻢ ﺑﻪﺣﺴﺎب آﻣﺪه، ﻗﻮاﻧﯿﻦ ﻣﺼﻮب ﻫﻤﭽﻮن اﺣﮑﺎم ﻓﻘﻬﯽ ﻫﺴﺘﻨﺪ. از اﯾﻦرو، ﺿﺮورت دارد اﺑﺘﺪا اﯾﻦ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﺑﺎزﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﺷﻮﻧﺪ؛ آنﮔﺎه اﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎطﻫﺎي ﻓﻘﻬﯽ ﻣﺒﺘﻨﯽ ﺑﺮ اﺻﻮل ﺟﺎري در ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ ﻣﻮرد واﮐﺎوي و ﻧﻘﺪ ﻋﻠﻤﯽ ﻗﺮار ﮔﯿﺮﻧﺪ. ﻣﻼﺣﻈﻪي اﻋﺘﺒﺎري ﺑﻮدن ﺑﯿﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ ﻓﻘﻬﯽ و ﺣﻘﻮﻗﯽ، ﺑﺮﺧﯽ ﮔﺰارهﻫﺎي ﺑﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮ ﻣﺴﻠﻢ، ﺧﺪﺷﻪ ﭘﺬﯾﺮ ﺑﻮده، ﻧﻔﯽ آﻧﻬﺎ ﺳﺒﺐ ﺑﻪدﺳﺖ آﻣﺪن ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﺳﺎزﮔﺎرﺗﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻋﺮف ﻋﻘﻼ اﺳﺖ. ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ روش ﺗﻮﺻﯿﻔﯽ-ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻠﯽ و ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻨﺎد ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺨﺎﻧﻪاي اﻧﺠﺎم ﺷﺪه ﻧﺸﺎن ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ ﻫﯿﭻ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم اﻋﺘﺒﺎري ﺑﺎ ﯾﮏ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم ﺣﻘﯿﻘﯽ ﯾﺎ ﺑﺎ ﯾﮏ ﻣﻔﻬﻮم اﻋﺘﺒﺎري دﯾﮕﺮ راﺑﻄﻪ واﻗﻌﯽ و ﻧﻔﺲ اﻻﻣﺮي ﻧﺪارد.
چكيده لاتين :
Failure to separate real from credit concepts is a jurisprudential challenge that sometimes causes wrong perceptions and undesirable practical consequences in the field of transactions. Since the matter contrary to the nature of the contract cannot be forged and is not stipulated in the contract, the binding nature of the rules governing the real concepts in credit is taken for granted; the approved laws are like jurisprudence. Therefore, it is necessary to recognize these concepts first; then jurisprudential inferences based on current principles in real concepts are analyzed and scientifically criticized. Considering the validity of most jurisprudential and legal concepts, some apparently certain propositions are vulnerable; their negation is the reason for obtaining results that are more compatible with common sense. The current research, which was carried out with the descriptive-analytical method and citing library sources, shows that no credit concept has a real and self-evident relationship with a real concept or with another credit concept.
سال انتشار :
1401
عنوان نشريه :
مطالعات تطبيقي فقه و اصول مذاهب
فايل PDF :
8724077
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت