ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ، ﻣﻼكﻫﺎ، ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮﻫﺎ و اﺑﺰارﻫﺎي ﻗﻀﺎوت ﺑﺮاي ﻋﻤﻠﮑﺮد ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﯾﺎدﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﺤﻠﯽ

Identify factors, criteria, indicators and judgment tools for the performance of Community Learning Centers

ﻫﺪف: ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪف ﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﯾﯽ ﻋﻮاﻣﻞ، ﻣﻼكﻫﺎ، ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮﻫﺎ و اﺑﺰارﻫﺎي ﻗﻀﺎوت در ﺧﺼﻮص ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﯾﺎدﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﺤﻠﯽ، ﻣﻮرد ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﻪ ﻗﺮار ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪاﺳﺖ. روش ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ: ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﺑﺎ روﯾﮑﺮد ﮐﯿﻔﯽ و روش ﭘﺪﯾﺪارﺷﻨﺎﺳﺎﻧﻪ از ﻧﻮع ﺗﻔﺴﯿﺮي ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﺪ. ﻣﯿﺪان ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ، ﻣﺴﺘﻨﺪات و ﻣﻄﺎﻟﻌﺎت اﻧﺠﺎمﺷﺪه در ﺧﺼﻮص ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﯾﺎدﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﺤﻠﯽ و ﺳﺎزﻣﺎن ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺳﻮادآﻣﻮزي و ﻫﻤﭽﻨﯿﻦ ﺗﻤﺎﻣﯽ ﺧﺒﺮﮔﺎن درون و ﺑﺮون ﺳﺎزﻣﺎﻧﯽ ﻧﻬﻀﺖ ﺳﻮادآﻣﻮزي و ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﯾﺎدﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﺤﻠﯽ ﻣﯽﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ ﮐﻪ ﺑﺎ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده از روش ﻧﻤﻮﻧﻪﮔﯿﺮي ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ و ﮔﻠﻮﻟﻪﺑﺮﻓﯽ اﻧﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﺟﻬﺖ ﮔﺮدآوري اﻃﻼﻋﺎت از ﻣﯿﺪان ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﯽ از اﺑﺰار ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﻧﯿﻤﻪﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎرﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪ اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﺑﻌﺪ از ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺑﺎ 70 ﻧﻔﺮ، اﻃﻼﻋﺎت ﺣﺎﻟﺖ اﺷﺒﺎع ﺑﻪ ﺧﻮد ﮔﺮﻓﺖ؛ اﻣﺎ ﺟﻬﺖ اﻃﻤﯿﻨﺎن ﺑﯿﺶﺗﺮ ﻣﺼﺎﺣﺒﻪ ﺗﺎ 4 ﻧﻔﺮ دﯾﮕﺮ اداﻣﻪ ﯾﺎﻓﺖ. ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻈﻮر ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ دادهﻫﺎي ﺑﺪﺳﺖآﻣﺪه و اﻋﺘﺒﺎرﺳﻨﺠﯽ آن، از روش ﻫﻔﺖ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﻪاي ﮐﻼﯾﺰي اﺳﺘﻔﺎده ﺷﺪ. ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎ: ﯾﺎﻓﺘﻪﻫﺎي ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ در ﻣﺠﻤﻮع، ﭼﻬﺎر ﻋﺎﻣﻞ )ﻣﺪﯾﺮان، ﻣﺘﺨﺼﺼﺎن، آﻣﻮزشدﻫﻨﺪﮔﺎن و ﻓﺮاﮔﯿﺮان(، 28 ﻣﻼك )در ﺑﺨﺶ زﻣﯿﻨﻪ 5 ﻣﻼك، در ﺑﺨﺶ دروﻧﺪاد 9 ﻣﻼك، در ﺑﺨﺶ ﻓﺮاﯾﻨﺪ 8 ﻣﻼك و در ﺑﺨﺶ ﺑﺮوﻧﺪاد 6 ﻣﻼك( و 139 ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮ ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس اﻟﮕﻮي ارزﺷﯿﺎﺑﯽ ﺳﯿﭗ در ﭼﻬﺎر ﺑﻌﺪ زﻣﯿﻨﻪ، درونداد، ﻓﺮاﯾﻨﺪ و ﺑﺮونداد اﺣﺼﺎ ﺷﺪﻧﺪ. ﻧﺘﯿﺠﻪﮔﯿﺮي: در ﻧﻬﺎﯾﺖ، از ﺗﺤﻠﯿﻞ دادهﻫﺎ و اﺳﺘﺨﺮاج ﻋﺎﻣﻞﻫﺎ، ﻣﻼكﻫﺎ، ﻧﺸﺎﻧﮕﺮﻫﺎ را ﺑﺮاﺳﺎس ﻣﺎﺗﺮﯾﺴﯽ روﺑﯿﮑﯽ ﮐﻪ ﻣﺒﯿﻦ وﺟﻮه ارزﺷﯿﺎﺑﯽ ﻣﺮاﮐﺰ ﯾﺎدﮔﯿﺮي ﻣﺤﻠﯽ ﻣﺘﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺑﺎ اﻟﮕﻮي ﺳﯿﭗ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ، ﺑﻪ دﺳﺖآﻣﺪ.

The current research has been done with the aim of identifying factors, criteria, indicators and judgment tools regarding Community Learning Centers. Methods: The research is an interpretative type with a qualitative approach and phenomenological method. The field of research is the documents and studies conducted regarding the Community Learning Centers and the Literacy Movement Organization, as well as experts inside and outside of the Literacy Movement Organization and Community Learning Centers who were selected by the purposeful and snowball sampling methods. A semi-structured interview technique was used, in order to collect information. After interviewing 70 people, the information became saturated; but for more certainty, the interview continued with 4 more people. In order to analyze the obtained data and validate it, the Collaizi’s seven-step method was used. Results: The findings—based on CIPP evaluation model in four dimensions of context, input, process and output—are 4 factors (managers, specialists, trainers and learners), 28 criteria (5 criteria in the context section, 9 criteria in the input section, 8 criteria in the process section and 6 criteria in the output section) and 139 indicators. Conclusion: Finally, from data analysis and extraction of factors, criteria, indicators were obtained based on the Rubik's matrix that shows the evaluation aspects of Community Learning Centers according to the CIPP model.