شماره ركورد :
1303595
عنوان مقاله :
تقابل زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو با مباني نظري هنر پاپ از منظر لارنس الووي
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
Subjective Aesthetics Contrast with the Theoretical Foundations of Pop Art according to Lawrence Alloway
پديد آورندگان :
جهانگرد، علي اكبر د انشگاه آزاد اسلامي واحد شيراز - د انشكد ه هنر و معماري - گروه نقاشي، شيراز، ايران
تعداد صفحه :
9
از صفحه :
15
از صفحه (ادامه) :
0
تا صفحه :
23
تا صفحه(ادامه) :
0
كليدواژه :
هنر پاپ , هنر زيبا , لارنس الووي , زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو
چكيده فارسي :
از مهم ترين مباد ي زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو كتاب نقد قوه ي حكم كانت است. تأثير اين زيبايي شناسي علاوه بر مد رنيسم، د ر هنر نيمه ي د وم سد ه بيستم نيز قابل پيگيري است. به نظر مي رسد بد ون د ر نظر د اشت زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو و تقابل آن با هنر نيمه د وم سد ه بيستم، بعيد است بتوان به د ركي جامع از ماهيت برخي جريانات هنري از جمله پاپ نائل آمد . اين د ر حالي است كه د ر تحليل جريان پاپ كم تر اين خصلت تقابلي و نتايج حاصل از آن مد نظر قرار مي گيرد . پژوهش حاضر بر آن است تا با اتكا به آرا لارنس الووي د ر خصوص جريان پاپ و موضع آن د ر قبال زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو به د ركي د قيق تر از ماهيت هنر پاپ د ست يابد . الووي با د ر نظرگرفتن خصلتي ارتباطي - كاركرد ي براي هنر و به طور اخص هنر پاپ، نه فقط به زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو واكنش نشان مي د هد بلكه د ر صد د ارائه تعريفي متفاوت از هنر، مبتني بر نظام ارتباطات است. با اتكا به نظريه ي ارتباطي -كاركرد ي الووي و خصايص تقابلي آن، مي توان چنين نتيجه گرفت كه جريان پاپ هويت خود را به طور صرف د ر تقابل با زيبايي شناسي سوبژكتيو تعريف مي كند . از طرف د يگر اين نظريه مطابق معمول موافقتي با ورود به موضوعات و تحليل هاي كيفي د ر خصوص هنر ند ارد .
چكيده لاتين :
Kant’s thoughts and his important book on beauty and aesthetics - Critique of Judgment - should be considered as one of the most important foundations of subjective aesthetics. Subjective aesthetics in Kant’s theory distinguishes fine arts from useful arts by attributing characteristics such as non-functional, non-conceptual, and genius-based to fine arts. In this respect subjective aesthetics laid the theoretical foundations of modern art - developed in the late nineteenth to the first half of the twentieth century- in the eighteenth century. In addition to modernism, which was directly influenced by subjective aesthetics, this approach also had a great influence on the art of the second half of the twentieth century. The main feature of some artistic currents of that period such as Pop art is based on a critical reaction to subjective aesthetics. Pop art is a turning point of a radically different approach to art and the foundations of the art world. Understanding the characteristics of Pop art is significantly based on reaction to subjective aesthetics, and it seems that without subjective aesthetics we cannot achieve a comprehensive understanding of the nature of some artistic currents in the second half of the twentieth century, including Pop art. Lawrence Alloway is one of the most important theorists of Post- Modernist art. Alloway initially used the term Pop art to describe some of the artists’ works in Europe and America; works that were different in themes and formal character from fine arts traditionally based on subjective aesthetics. Opposing modernist elitism and any transcendental character for art, Lawrence Alloway sought to achieve a broad definition of culture and art beyond subjective aesthetics; a definition beyond the limits of fine arts, referring to all human activities. In this way, is removed the distinction between fine arts and useful arts in Kant’s theory. In this article, we seek to gain a more accurate understanding of the nature of Pop art by considering Lawrence Alloway’s views - as the most important theorist of Pop art- and his thinking on Kantian aesthetics. Finally, Lawrence Alloway’s theory seems to consider art as functional and communicative system, in order to both respond to subjective aesthetics and to offer a different definition of art in general, which is based on the system of functional communication. On this basis and regarding Pop art, it can be inferred that this theory does not agree with qualitative topics and analyses of art. Because qualitative analysis depends on subjective aesthetics, it is the opposite of Lawrence Alloway’s communicative approach to art. From Lawrence Alloway’s point of view, qualitative values in art seem to neglect the achievement of a common and equal field for all in art. For this reason, art as a communicative medium is considered only as a platform for providing information to the audience
سال انتشار :
1401
عنوان نشريه :
هنرهاي زيبا- هنرهاي تجسمي
فايل PDF :
8733753
لينک به اين مدرک :
بازگشت