كليدواژه :
Iran , جزء گرايانه , كل گرايانه , نقد , علوم اجتماعي , سه جهان , لاكاتوش , ايران , Problem solving , وضعيت آكادميت , SCIENCE , معرفت عيني , 3 worlds , يوتوبيايي , general to specific , مسيله اصلاحي , research program , پويو، كارل , academia , objective knowledge , Criticism , حل مسيله , علم
چكيده لاتين :
This article first probes the relationship between general/utopian and specific/reformist approaches to social problem solving to endorse the paradigmatic shift from the former to the latter. It then presents the Popperian 3 world theory and augments it with the views of Lacatos to highlight the effective role of rival research programs and cross-criticism in social problem solving and the advancement of science. Finally, based on these theoretical formulations, the article critiques problem solving approaches within the Iranian academic structure.
