نقدي بر ملاك تمييز (علم تجربي از مابعدالطبيعه ) كارل ريموند پاپر

Karl Raymond Popperʹs Criterion for Demarcation Between Science and Pseudoscience

The purpose of this paper is to assess Karl Raymond Popperʹs "Criterion for Demarcation between Science and Pseudoscience". Here based on critiques of Larry Laudan, Imere lakatos, Thomas Kuhn, Harold Brown, and W. W. Bartley about the Criterion, new critiques about the demarcation theory are proposed. Criticizing the logical consequences of Popper is the model adopted in this study. In this assessment, Popperʹs conventions for defining "Science", is divided into three stages and every stage, in turn, is criticized.