عنوان مقاله :
كفايت نمونه و فراواني سلول سنگفروشي آتيپيك در اسميرهاي سرويكو واژينال: روش معمولي در مقايسه با سيتولوژي در محيط مايع
عنوان به زبان ديگر :
The specimen adequacy and Atypical Squamous Cell frequency:
conventional versus liquid-based cytology pap smears
پديد آورندگان :
ايزدي مود، نرگس نويسنده گروه پاتولوژي، بيمارستان ميرزا كوچك خان، دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران Izadi Mood, N. , ده دشتي، محمدرضا نويسنده گروه پاتولوژي، بيمارستان ميرزا كوچك خان، دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران Dehdashti, M.R. , افتخار، زهرا نويسنده گروه زنان و زايمان، بيمارستان ميرزا كوچك خان، دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران Eftekhar, Z. , احمدي، علي نويسنده دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران- بيمارستان سينا- گروه پاتولوژي Ahmadi, A
اطلاعات موجودي :
ماهنامه سال 1387
رتبه نشريه :
فاقد درجه علمي
كليدواژه :
پاپ اسمير معمولي , ASC , كفايت نمونه , پاپ اسمير در محيط مايع , Conventional pap smear , ASC , specimen adequacy , liquid based cytology
چكيده لاتين :
Background: The papanicolaou (pap) smear has been used to screen cervical cancer
since 1940. Recently, a number of new technologies have been developed to improve
the detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. However, there is substantial
controversy about whether the new tests offer meaningful advantages over the
conventional pap smear. Ideally, these new tests will increase the early detection of
meaningful pap smear abnormalities, reduce the number of unsatisfactory smears and
provide fewer ambiguous results.
Methods: In this prospective study the result of Liquid- based cytology smears (Liquid
prep method) compared with conventional pap smears in terms of adequacy and ASC
diagnosis in 289 patients in pathology department of mirza kochak khan hospital
(Tehran, 2005– 2006). The smears were interpreted based on Bethesda system 2001.
Results: In conventional pap smear method, the number of occasions of unsatisfactory
smear was 24(5%). In Liquid- based cytology method 66(22.8%) smears were
unsatisfactory, In which difference between unsatisfactory groups were statistically
significant (p<0.05), Also ASC diagnosis in conventional method 5(1.8%) as compared
with Liquid- based cytology 6(2.1%), was not statistically significant (p>0.05).
Conclusions: There was no significant difference between two methods in term of ASC
diagnosis but in conventional method adequacy of specimen was significantly better as
compared with this Liquid- based cytology method.
عنوان نشريه :
مجله دانشكده پزشكي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران
عنوان نشريه :
مجله دانشكده پزشكي دانشگاه علوم پزشكي تهران
اطلاعات موجودي :
ماهنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1387
كلمات كليدي :
#تست#آزمون###امتحان